Friday, August 3, 2018

Sell USDINR; target of 68.48 - 68.40: ICICI Direct

ICICI Direct's currency report on USDINR

Spot Currency� �

The rupee extended gains even as the RBI moved to raise interest rates for a second time in 2018. The RBI increased benchmark rates by 25 bps as expected, which will help the rupee as it could contain the widening rate differential between RBI and other major central banks, especially the Federal Reserve �� US $ rose mildly vs. major currencies even as Fed maintained the benchmark interest rates as expected . Fed emphasised on strength in the US economy that has cemented the prospects of a September rate hike and kept alive the possibility of a fourth rate hike in December.

Benchmark yield �

Sovereign bonds rose sharply tracking the decline in yields even as RBI raised interest rates by 25 bps as expected �� US bonds declined sharply as benchmark yields ended above 3 . 0 %. However, the US $ witnessed muted action as investors remain cautious in the backdrop of simmering trade tensions between the US and its major trading partners.

Currency futures on NSE The dollar - rupee August contract on the NSE was at 68. 67 in the previous session. August contract open interest declined 0.51 % in the previous day �� We expect the US$INR to meet supply pressure at higher levels. Utilise upsides in the pair to initiate short positions.

Intra-day strategy

related news EURINR is expected to trade appreciate today: Angel Broking Hold HCL Technologies; target of Rs 1050: ICICI Direct Hold NTPC; target of Rs 160: ICICI Direct

US$INR August futures contract (NSE) View: Bearish on US$INR
Sell US$INR in the range of 68.65-68.71 Market Lot: US$1000
Target: 68.48 / 68.40 Stop Loss: 68.83
Support Resistance
S1/ S2: 68.55 / 68.40 R1/R2:68.70 /68.85

Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on moneycontrol.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.

Read More First Published on Aug 2, 2018 10:31 am

Saturday, July 21, 2018

Rowan Atkinson Death Hoax: ‘Mr. Bean Is Dead’ Links Linked to Virus

A link that says ‘Mr. Bean Is Dead’ has been making the rounds in the Internet lately but this is actually a Rowan Atkinson death hoax that’s linked to a computer virus.

Mr. Bean Is Dead Source: Wikipedia

The link is claiming that Atkinson, who plays Mr. Bean, is dead in a viral death hoax that claims to offer video tribute to the actor from “FOX BREAKING NEWS.” The links seem legitimately, offering the actor’s birth and alleged death date along with the preview image.

Once users click the video link, they will be sent to a falsified security page that requests that they dial a phone number, according to reports. If you do call the phone number on screen, you will be asked to offer your credit card information so you can purchase what the hackers claim is a software fix.

Instead, the downloaded file will fill your computer with viruses. The death hoax video has been around since July 2017 but it is making a comeback once again. The video claims that Atkinson lost his life in a car crash.

This isn’t the first time that the death hoax debunking website Snopes verified this information and discovered that the actor is still alive and in good health. There are other celebrities that may lead to your computer getting infected with a virus, including singer Shawn Mendes due to his rising popularity.

Compare Brokers

Friday, July 20, 2018

Is Marijuana the Best Medicine for Epilepsy?

GW Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:GWPH) made a big splash last month when the Food and Drug Administration granted approval to its Epidiolex, a purified formulation of cannabidiol, a chemical compound found naturally in marijuana. The approval sets the stage for more widespread use of marijuana in epilepsy. However, new data from trials evaluating another drug, Zogenix's (NASDAQ:ZGNX) ZX008, calls into question whether marijuana is really the best treatment option.

In this clip from The Motley Fool's Industry Focus: Healthcare, analyst Kristine Harjes and Motley Fool contributor Todd Campbell discuss how Epidiolex and ZX008 could soon wind up competing against each other in this important market.

A full transcript follows the video.

This video was recorded on July 18, 2018.

Kristine Harjes: We'll kick things off this episode with an update on the epilepsy drug market, specifically certain types of childhood onset epilepsy that respond poorly to existing treatment options. Last month, a company called GW Pharmaceuticals, ticker GWPH, won approval for the first-ever marijuana-derived drug, which was approved to treat Dravet Syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. We touched on this on our April 25th episode after the drug got a thumbs-up from the FDA's advisory committee. Then, the drug went on to be approved. It's called Epidiolex. It's actually not yet available for sale because we're still waiting for it to be scheduled by the Drug Enforcement Administration.

The reason that we bring all of this up again is because there's some new news on the competition front in this space. Before we get to that competition, Todd, do you want to add any details on GW Pharmaceuticals' Epidiolex

Todd Campbell: Investors should know basically what it is. It's a purified version of cannabidiol. We call that CBD. If you ever hear anybody talking about marijuana and they mention CBD, that's what it is. It's one of well over 100 different things that go into making up the marijuana plant. As a matter of fact, it's the second most common thing found in the marijuana plant, accounting for about 40% of its extract -- the most common, obviously, is THC.

CBD is very intriguing to medical researchers because, unlike THC, it does not cause the euphoric high that's associated with smoking marijuana. People are thinking, if CBD is useful medically, we can get away with doing that without exposing patients to the risk of that euphoria.

The other thing that I think is interesting to know, Kristine, we obviously want to update investors on what's going on with GW Pharma, we want to talk about Zogenix, which is the competitor that just had some really interesting news come out. But, I came across this stat as I was doing my research for today's show, and it really surprised me. We don't talk about epilepsy much on this show. Did you know that there are more people with epilepsy than Parkinson's, autism, and multiple sclerosis combined?

Harjes: Wow, that's super interesting. Although, with these drugs, we are talking about very, very specific types of epilepsy that are extremely rare. But, it's interesting how widespread the broader indication is.

Campbell: I think investors have to recognize, because it's such a large patient population, and because, yes, we're talking about Dravet Syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome specifically, there is obviously the potential for this to get used off-label by doctors -- once Epidiolex got approved, and once it becomes available, doctors can write prescriptions for it off-label. There's also the chance for other studies to get done in other, more common forms of epilepsy.

Harjes: That's super interesting. Let's move right along to the competitor, which is another twist and turn in this story that's worth mentioning. The company, as you alluded to, is called Zogenix, ticker ZGNX. They had massive trading days on the market on Thursday and Friday of last week. They gained 32% of their total market cap over those two days alone, based mostly on the successful Phase III data that they reported in their drug ZX008 in Dravet Syndrome.

Campbell: Zogenix is up 415% since last August. That's a mind-numbing return. Of course, the excitement is due to ZX008 and the potential for it to maybe elbow market share away from Epidiolex, if it eventually gets FDA approval. Last fall, they reported positive outcomes from their first Phase III data in Dravet Syndrome, showing that they could reduce monthly seizures in this tough to treat patient population. Then, last week, they had the results come out for their second Phase III trial -- again, significantly reducing monthly seizures in this patient population.

Kristine, you and I talk about it all the time, you can't compare two separate studies head-to-head against one another, it's just bad science to do so. But it's very hard not to do that as an investor, especially when you look at Zogenix's information or data showing a 63% median reduction in monthly seizures for these patients vs. Epidiolex, which, depending on the trial, had a reduction of between 40-50%. Arguably, what you could probably safely say is, both of these drugs are very effective.

Harjes: You're right that it's bad science to compare, but the reason that we always follow that statement with a "but ... " is, people out there in the world, if you're a doctor looking to prescribe one of these two drugs, you're going to see those numbers. Even if you know they haven't been tested head-to-head, if you're looking for something to differentiate them, that's a very easy way to make the decision.

But -- here's another but -- safety is going to end up being an even more important part of this. Something that I want to point out from the Zogenix press release is that ZX008 was stated to be generally well-tolerated in the Phase III study, with adverse events consistent with those observed in earlier studies, and also consistent with the known safety profile of Fenfluramine. That's what ZX008 is a low dose of.

Todd, I want to get your input here on what you make of that, given that this drug, Fenfluramine, was part of the infamous Fen-Phen, an obesity drug that was pulled from the market back in the 1990s due to cardiovascular side effects.

Campbell: Breathing new life into an old, discarded drug. Fen-Phen was heralded for its ability to help battle back obesity. However, when push came to shove, after it got used in the real world, it was discovered that it could increase the risk of cardiovascular problems that could lead to death. So, the FDA asked for it to be removed from the market. I'm sure that many people will be weighing that in the back of their minds, doctors and patients, if ZX008 makes its way past the FDA to the market and they're trying to compare these competing drugs.

So far, in hundreds of patients studied by Zogenix, we have not seen any scary cardiovascular signals. It may be that they found the sweet spot, the right amount of dosing that wouldn't cause the cardiovascular problems, but still has efficacy.

The thing that investors ought to realize, too, though, is, you might think, "OK, this is a slam dunk, ZX008. It's Fen, who's going to want to prescribe that?" But, it wasn't like Epidiolex came through with a squeaky-clean safety profile, either. As a matter of fact, patients who get prescribed that drug will have to undergo constant monitoring to make sure they don't end up with elevated liver enzymes, because that was a problem that was observed in its trials.

There's a little bit of a debate here between, we have these two very efficacious products for a patient population that's in desperate need. Remember, Kristine, these people are suffering dozens of seizures per month. Frankly, they don't respond to the current antiepileptics on the market. The difference in 10% of efficacy when you're having dozens, that's a significant efficacy difference, theoretically. Kristine, I think it'll just come down to perceptions -- how do people perceive marijuana vs. how they perceive Fen-Phen.

Harjes: Yeah, absolutely. Price could be another component, but at this stage, it's too early to tell.

Friday, July 13, 2018

Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) Receives Media Impact Rating of -0.07

News coverage about Build-A-Bear Workshop (NYSE:BBW) has been trending somewhat negative on Thursday, Accern Sentiment Analysis reports. Accern identifies positive and negative press coverage by analyzing more than 20 million blog and news sources. Accern ranks coverage of publicly-traded companies on a scale of -1 to 1, with scores closest to one being the most favorable. Build-A-Bear Workshop earned a media sentiment score of -0.07 on Accern’s scale. Accern also assigned media stories about the specialty retailer an impact score of 43.9525750448852 out of 100, meaning that recent press coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an effect on the company’s share price in the next few days.

Here are some of the media stories that may have effected Accern Sentiment’s rankings:

Get Build-A-Bear Workshop alerts: VIDEO: Build-a-Bear Workshop suspends “Pay Your Age Day” promotion; line wraps inside Battlefield Mall (ky3.com) Build-A-Bear pulls promotion early due to huge lines (seekingalpha.com) Build-A-Bear Workshop Announces ��Pay Your Age�� Day Deals in Stores July 12 (eastcountytoday.net) Everybody, Come On In! Build-A-Bear Workshop Announces ‘Pay Your Age’ Day Deal In Stores On July 12 (finance.yahoo.com)

A number of brokerages have issued reports on BBW. ValuEngine lowered Build-A-Bear Workshop from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Saturday, May 12th. Zacks Investment Research lowered Build-A-Bear Workshop from a “hold” rating to a “strong sell” rating in a research report on Friday, June 1st.

Build-A-Bear Workshop traded up $0.10, reaching $7.80, during trading on Thursday, MarketBeat reports. 113,700 shares of the company’s stock were exchanged, compared to its average volume of 123,418. Build-A-Bear Workshop has a 1-year low of $7.25 and a 1-year high of $11.00. The firm has a market capitalization of $115.68 million, a PE ratio of 14.72 and a beta of -0.48.

Build-A-Bear Workshop (NYSE:BBW) last posted its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, May 31st. The specialty retailer reported $0.02 EPS for the quarter, missing the Zacks’ consensus estimate of $0.25 by ($0.23). Build-A-Bear Workshop had a return on equity of 5.54% and a net margin of 1.57%. The firm had revenue of $83.18 million during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $92.30 million. During the same period in the prior year, the firm posted $0.17 EPS. analysts predict that Build-A-Bear Workshop will post 0.5 EPS for the current year.

About Build-A-Bear Workshop

Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc operates as a specialty retailer of plush animals and related products. The company operates through three segments: Direct-to-Consumer, International Franchising, and Commercial. Its merchandise comprises a range of styles of stuffed animals; clothing, shoes, and accessories for the stuffed animals; and other toy and novelty items.

Insider Buying and Selling by Quarter for Build-A-Bear Workshop (NYSE:BBW)

Wednesday, July 11, 2018

-$0.10 EPS Expected for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) This Quarter

Analysts expect that Scorpio Tankers Inc. (NYSE:STNG) will report earnings per share (EPS) of ($0.10) for the current fiscal quarter, according to Zacks. Five analysts have provided estimates for Scorpio Tankers’ earnings. The lowest EPS estimate is ($0.15) and the highest is ($0.07). Scorpio Tankers posted earnings of ($0.09) per share in the same quarter last year, which would suggest a negative year over year growth rate of 11.1%. The firm is expected to issue its next quarterly earnings results on Monday, September 17th.

According to Zacks, analysts expect that Scorpio Tankers will report full-year earnings of ($0.20) per share for the current fiscal year, with EPS estimates ranging from ($0.42) to ($0.02). For the next financial year, analysts expect that the company will post earnings of $0.16 per share, with EPS estimates ranging from ($0.08) to $0.52. Zacks Investment Research’s EPS averages are a mean average based on a survey of sell-side research firms that follow Scorpio Tankers.

Get Scorpio Tankers alerts:

Scorpio Tankers (NYSE:STNG) last posted its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, April 25th. The shipping company reported ($0.10) earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of ($0.08) by ($0.02). The firm had revenue of $156.50 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $154.72 million. Scorpio Tankers had a negative return on equity of 7.61% and a negative net margin of 32.67%. The firm’s quarterly revenue was up 27.4% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period in the prior year, the company earned ($0.07) earnings per share.

STNG has been the subject of several recent research reports. Bank of America reduced their price objective on Scorpio Tankers from $3.85 to $2.75 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research report on Monday, March 19th. DNB Markets raised Scorpio Tankers from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Wednesday, April 25th. Deutsche Bank reaffirmed a “buy” rating on shares of Scorpio Tankers in a research report on Tuesday, April 10th. Zacks Investment Research raised Scorpio Tankers from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Wednesday, June 27th. Finally, ValuEngine raised Scorpio Tankers from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Saturday, June 2nd. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have issued a hold rating and eight have assigned a buy rating to the company. The company presently has an average rating of “Buy” and a consensus target price of $4.21.

Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently modified their holdings of the stock. Bank of New York Mellon Corp boosted its position in Scorpio Tankers by 232.0% during the fourth quarter. Bank of New York Mellon Corp now owns 16,105,736 shares of the shipping company’s stock valued at $49,123,000 after purchasing an additional 11,255,133 shares during the last quarter. Schwab Charles Investment Management Inc. boosted its position in Scorpio Tankers by 38.2% during the fourth quarter. Schwab Charles Investment Management Inc. now owns 920,056 shares of the shipping company’s stock valued at $2,807,000 after purchasing an additional 254,119 shares during the last quarter. OppenheimerFunds Inc. boosted its position in Scorpio Tankers by 35.0% during the fourth quarter. OppenheimerFunds Inc. now owns 83,215 shares of the shipping company’s stock valued at $254,000 after purchasing an additional 21,562 shares during the last quarter. Delek Group Ltd. acquired a new position in Scorpio Tankers during the fourth quarter valued at approximately $3,020,000. Finally, A.R.T. Advisors LLC acquired a new position in Scorpio Tankers during the first quarter valued at approximately $1,567,000. 57.02% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

Shares of Scorpio Tankers traded down $0.02, hitting $2.84, on Monday, MarketBeat Ratings reports. 1,577,365 shares of the stock were exchanged, compared to its average volume of 3,753,313. The company has a quick ratio of 1.05, a current ratio of 1.09 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.55. Scorpio Tankers has a fifty-two week low of $1.85 and a fifty-two week high of $4.18.

The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Thursday, June 28th. Investors of record on Wednesday, June 6th were given a dividend of $0.01 per share. The ex-dividend date was Tuesday, June 5th. This represents a $0.04 annualized dividend and a yield of 1.41%. Scorpio Tankers’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently -8.51%.

About Scorpio Tankers

Scorpio Tankers Inc, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the seaborne transportation of refined petroleum products worldwide. As of March 22, 2018, its fleet consisted of 109 tankers, including 38 LR2, 12 LR1, 45 MR, and 14 Handymax tankers with an average age of approximately 2.6 years; and 20 time or bareboat chartered-in tankers, which include 2 LR2, 10 MR, and 8 Handymax tankers.

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Scorpio Tankers (STNG)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Earnings History and Estimates for Scorpio Tankers (NYSE:STNG)

Tuesday, July 10, 2018

Earthstone Energy Inc (ESTE) to Post FY2019 Earnings of $1.54 Per Share, SunTrust Banks Forecasts

Earthstone Energy Inc (NYSE:ESTE) – Stock analysts at SunTrust Banks increased their FY2019 earnings estimates for Earthstone Energy in a research note issued to investors on Thursday, July 5th. SunTrust Banks analyst N. Dingmann now forecasts that the oil and gas producer will post earnings of $1.54 per share for the year, up from their prior forecast of $1.48.

Get Earthstone Energy alerts:

Other research analysts have also issued research reports about the company. Royal Bank of Canada assumed coverage on Earthstone Energy in a report on Monday. They set an “outperform” rating for the company. Zacks Investment Research raised Earthstone Energy from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $10.00 price objective for the company in a report on Tuesday, May 15th. Robert W. Baird set a $17.00 price objective on Earthstone Energy and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, March 15th. Imperial Capital set a $14.00 price objective on Earthstone Energy and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, April 5th. Finally, ValuEngine lowered Earthstone Energy from a “sell” rating to a “strong sell” rating in a report on Wednesday, May 2nd. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have issued a hold rating and nine have assigned a buy rating to the stock. The stock currently has an average rating of “Buy” and an average price target of $13.89.

Earthstone Energy opened at $10.50 on Monday, Marketbeat Ratings reports. Earthstone Energy has a twelve month low of $7.80 and a twelve month high of $12.16. The company has a quick ratio of 0.76, a current ratio of 0.76 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.04. The stock has a market cap of $621.36 million, a price-to-earnings ratio of 7.15, a P/E/G ratio of 0.38 and a beta of 1.10.

Earthstone Energy (NYSE:ESTE) last posted its earnings results on Thursday, May 3rd. The oil and gas producer reported $0.19 earnings per share for the quarter, beating the Zacks’ consensus estimate of $0.15 by $0.04. The business had revenue of $40.90 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $38.36 million. Earthstone Energy had a positive return on equity of 5.70% and a negative net margin of 5.93%.

Large investors have recently added to or reduced their stakes in the stock. Virtu Financial LLC bought a new stake in Earthstone Energy in the 4th quarter worth approximately $133,000. Two Sigma Investments LP bought a new stake in Earthstone Energy in the 4th quarter worth approximately $179,000. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. lifted its position in Earthstone Energy by 71.2% in the 4th quarter. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. now owns 26,787 shares of the oil and gas producer’s stock worth $285,000 after buying an additional 11,141 shares during the last quarter. Prudential Financial Inc. bought a new stake in Earthstone Energy in the 1st quarter worth approximately $323,000. Finally, Dynamic Technology Lab Private Ltd lifted its position in Earthstone Energy by 42.7% in the 1st quarter. Dynamic Technology Lab Private Ltd now owns 36,240 shares of the oil and gas producer’s stock worth $367,000 after buying an additional 10,848 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors own 18.06% of the company’s stock.

Earthstone Energy Company Profile

Earthstone Energy, Inc, an oil and natural gas development and production company, operates in the up-stream segment of the oil and natural gas industry in the United States. Its asset portfolio includes the Midland Basin of west Texas and the Eagle Ford trend of south Texas. As of December 31, 2017, the company operated 91 gross Eagle Ford wells; and 12 gross Austin Chalk wells, as well as had 79,976 thousand barrels of oil equivalent (MBOE) of total proved reserves, 19,961 MBOE of proved developed reserves, and 60,015 MBOE of proved undeveloped reserves.

Earnings History and Estimates for Earthstone Energy (NYSE:ESTE)

Monday, July 9, 2018

Veracyte (VCYT) Stock Rating Upgraded by BidaskClub

Veracyte (NASDAQ:VCYT) was upgraded by equities research analysts at BidaskClub from a “buy” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a research note issued to investors on Friday.

Several other brokerages also recently commented on VCYT. ValuEngine upgraded Veracyte from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research note on Wednesday, June 20th. Zacks Investment Research upgraded Veracyte from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Thursday, May 24th. Finally, BTIG Research set a $13.00 target price on Veracyte and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research note on Wednesday, May 2nd. Three research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, three have given a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the company. The company presently has an average rating of “Buy” and a consensus target price of $9.16.

Get Veracyte alerts:

Shares of VCYT opened at $9.96 on Friday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.84, a current ratio of 3.98 and a quick ratio of 3.59. The stock has a market capitalization of $341.40 million, a PE ratio of -10.95 and a beta of 1.67. Veracyte has a one year low of $5.23 and a one year high of $9.98.

Veracyte (NASDAQ:VCYT) last issued its earnings results on Tuesday, May 1st. The biotechnology company reported ($0.27) EPS for the quarter, missing the Thomson Reuters’ consensus estimate of ($0.25) by ($0.02). The firm had revenue of $20.04 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $18.28 million. Veracyte had a negative net margin of 42.30% and a negative return on equity of 80.99%. sell-side analysts forecast that Veracyte will post -1 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

In other Veracyte news, Chairman Bonnie H. Anderson sold 12,000 shares of Veracyte stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, June 12th. The stock was sold at an average price of $8.00, for a total transaction of $96,000.00. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at the SEC website. Also, insider Christopher M. Hall sold 20,000 shares of Veracyte stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, June 19th. The shares were sold at an average price of $9.02, for a total value of $180,400.00. Following the transaction, the insider now owns 42,964 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $387,535.28. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Over the last 90 days, insiders sold 48,509 shares of company stock valued at $426,541. 13.70% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.

A number of hedge funds have recently added to or reduced their stakes in the business. Acuta Capital Partners LLC boosted its stake in Veracyte by 0.7% during the 1st quarter. Acuta Capital Partners LLC now owns 3,318,000 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock valued at $18,448,000 after purchasing an additional 22,889 shares during the last quarter. Cannell Capital LLC boosted its stake in Veracyte by 7.7% during the 1st quarter. Cannell Capital LLC now owns 2,059,233 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock valued at $11,449,000 after purchasing an additional 146,606 shares during the last quarter. BlackRock Inc. boosted its stake in Veracyte by 46.3% during the 4th quarter. BlackRock Inc. now owns 1,842,981 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock valued at $12,034,000 after purchasing an additional 583,582 shares during the last quarter. First Light Asset Management LLC boosted its stake in Veracyte by 7.4% during the 1st quarter. First Light Asset Management LLC now owns 849,566 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock valued at $4,724,000 after purchasing an additional 58,229 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Millennium Management LLC boosted its stake in Veracyte by 3.0% during the 4th quarter. Millennium Management LLC now owns 780,770 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock valued at $5,098,000 after purchasing an additional 23,089 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 71.52% of the company’s stock.

About Veracyte

Veracyte, Inc operates as a genomic diagnostics company in the United States. The company uses genomic technology to resolve diagnostic uncertainty. It offers Afirma Thyroid FNA Analysis solution; cytopathology testing services; and the Afirma Malignancy Classifiers to manage thyroid nodule patients.

Saturday, July 7, 2018

Cramer says 'accidentally anti-Chinese' FANG stocks are 'perfect for this market'

With U.S. investors laser-focused on the White House's tit-for-tat trade dispute with Beijing, CNBC's Jim Cramer wanted to hone in on four stocks in the market that are most resilient to trade tensions.

The lucky few? The members of FANG, the "Mad Money" host's acronym for the stocks of Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google, now Alphabet.

"In one of the great coincidences in stock market history, FANG��s got nothing in China," Cramer said Thursday as stocks rose in a day of recovery from the U.S.-China dispute.

"All four are accidentally anti-Chinese stocks, and that is perfect for this market," he added.

Facebook, for one, is blocked in the People's Republic, where the government has been loathe to allow the social media platform to do business for fear of the free speech and social unrest it could encourage among users.

Amazon's major Chinese obstacle is its counterpart, Alibaba, a comparably massive e-commerce player already established in China that makes even the world's richest man, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, obsolete.

Netflix, like Facebook, is also blocked in China.

And Alphabet, the parent company of Google, withdrew its business from China by choice as a way of protesting the government's heightened focus on censorship.

"They literally leave billions on the table as a matter of principle," Cramer said of Alphabet. "Still, Alphabet��s lack of China exposure right now makes it a better stock than if it had China as a major market. Ironic, isn��t it?"

Some other factors that make FANG this market's lucky few? Consider the technology giants' secular growth �� growth that doesn't rely on the rest of the global economy �� and economic immunity, the "Mad Money" host said.

For example, both investors and Federal Reserve officials have expressed concerns about inflation rising due to tariffs, oil prices and growing freight costs. But when it comes to FANG, the market's biggest worries become minor issues.

"If you were going to design four large companies that would be relatively immune to inflation, they��d look a lot like Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Alphabet," Cramer said.

So when it comes to Facebook and its Instagram momentum, Amazon and its newfound pharmacy business, Netflix and its seemingly endless overseas opportunity and Alphabet with its wide array of businesses, Cramer was actually bullish on the stocks many investors see as far-too-expensive investments.

As of Thursday's close, shares of Facebook were up 3 percent at $198.45; shares of Amazon were up a modest 0.34 percent at $1,699.73; shares of Netflix were up 2 percent at $398.39; and Alphabet's Class A shares were up 2.24 percent, at $1,141.29.

"I know nothing lasts forever, and it��s easy to see why these FANG stocks are reviled for being too high, too fast, too rich, too whatever," he said. "But that��s been the case ever since we coined the term five years ago. Who knows? Maybe it'll be the same five years hence."

WATCH: Cramer doubles down on FANG amid trade tensions show chapters Cramer says 'accidentally anti-Chinese' FANG stocks are 'perfect for this market' Cramer says 'accidentally anti-Chinese' FANG stocks are 'perfect for this market'    12 Hours Ago | 08:03

Disclosure: Cramer's charitable trust owns shares of Facebook, Amazon and Alphabet.

Questions for Cramer? Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC Want to take a deep dive into Cramer's world? Hit him up! Mad Money Twitter - Jim Cramer Twitter - Facebook - Instagram - Vine Questions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? madcap@cnbc.com

Friday, July 6, 2018

Tesla Shares Are At A Critical Intersection

&l;p&g;&l;img class=&q;dam-image bloomberg size-large wp-image-42584208&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/42584208/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Newly constructed production tent at the Tesla Inc. manufacturing facility. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Tesla announced its &l;a href=&q;http://ir.tesla.com/news-releases/news-release-details/tesla-q2-2018-vehicle-production-and-deliveries&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;preliminary June quarter res&l;/a&g;ults before the market opened on Monday. After seeing a $22 spike upwards in its shares from Friday&a;rsquo;s close of $343 to almost $365 in the first six minutes of trading, the stock closed down almost $8 to $335. The stock continued its selloff on Tuesday, falling over $24 or 7% to just under $311.

As you can see in the main part of the chart below by closing at $310.86 the shares are barely above its 50 day moving average of $310.16 and barely below its 100 day moving average of $311.51. It blew past to the downside its 200 day moving average of $321.99. It will be critical for the shares to not move much further downward as there isn&a;rsquo;t much support until it falls to around $280.

Probably the next support level for Tesla stock is when it bounced off lows of $281 on April 25, $284 on May 3 and $275 on May 22. If the shares don&a;rsquo;t hold near $280 it could quickly fall to around $250 where it spiked downwards to in the late March/early April timeframe.

&l;img class=&q;size-full wp-image-12061&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/chuckjones/files/2018/07/Tesla-StockCharts-180703-July-3-2018-3-YEAR-CHART-COMPARED-TO-APPLE.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;Tesla price chart&q; data-height=&q;633&q; data-width=&q;1000&q;&g; Tesla price chart

&l;strong&g;Hit resistance levels before falling&l;/strong&g;

The three top horizontal lines depict resistance levels. In 2017 the shares topped out in June at $383 and September at $385. Then in late January and early February Tesla&a;rsquo;s stock closed at $353, $354 and $357, respectively. These were resistance levels until the shares did break through in the middle of June, but this only lasted for a few days.

&l;!--donotpaginate--&g;

You can also see in the top portion of the chart that the shares Relative Strength Index, or RSI, was above 70 when it was able to break above the previous resistance levels, which indicated an overbought condition. While a company&a;rsquo;s shares can continue to move higher with an RSI above 70, pretty much any fundamental concern will lead to the stock falling. I had &l;a href=&q;http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2018/07/01/tesla-investors-model-3-production-overunder-around-4500-cars-per-week/&q;&g;pegged the over/under at 4,500 for the last week of Model 3 production&l;/a&g; for the stock to not be hit. However, there seems to be enough concerns about any corners that were cut, what cost were incurred to make the target and how sustainable it is that caused the stock to decline.

&l;strong&g;Comparing Tesla stock chart to Apple&a;rsquo;s&l;/strong&g;

Due to Tesla&a;rsquo;s stock volatility, moving averages may not provide much support to the share price vs. other stocks that have a more defined trading pattern. Below is a chart of Apple&a;rsquo;s shares over the past three years. As you can see the moving averages have tended to provide support, but not necessarily the same one each time. The most recent example is the past seven trading days as Apple has essentially found support and stayed above its 50 day moving average (blue line).

&l;img class=&q;size-full wp-image-12060&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/chuckjones/files/2018/07/Apple-StockCharts-180703-July-3-2018-USED-FOR-TESLA-ARTICLE.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;Apple price chart&q; data-height=&q;633&q; data-width=&q;1000&q;&g; Apple price chart&l;/p&g;

Wednesday, July 4, 2018

Compass Minerals International (CMP) Rating Lowered to Sell at ValuEngine

Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) was downgraded by investment analysts at ValuEngine from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note issued to investors on Monday.

Several other research analysts also recently commented on CMP. Zacks Investment Research upgraded shares of Compass Minerals International from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Thursday, May 3rd. Stephens assumed coverage on shares of Compass Minerals International in a report on Monday, April 2nd. They issued an “overweight” rating and a $74.00 target price on the stock. Three research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, two have assigned a hold rating and four have issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. The stock has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $71.50.

Get Compass Minerals International alerts:

Compass Minerals International traded down $1.10, hitting $64.65, during trading on Monday, according to Marketbeat. The stock had a trading volume of 224,100 shares, compared to its average volume of 350,824. The company has a market capitalization of $2.22 billion, a PE ratio of 23.51 and a beta of 0.59. Compass Minerals International has a 12 month low of $56.50 and a 12 month high of $76.65. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.82, a current ratio of 2.38 and a quick ratio of 1.51.

Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) last announced its earnings results on Tuesday, May 1st. The basic materials company reported $0.37 EPS for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.65 by ($0.28). The firm had revenue of $437.90 million during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $431.82 million. Compass Minerals International had a return on equity of 12.03% and a net margin of 2.39%. The business’s revenue was up 12.9% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same quarter last year, the business earned $0.63 EPS. analysts anticipate that Compass Minerals International will post 2.92 earnings per share for the current year.

In other news, Director Amy Yoder sold 600 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, May 15th. The shares were sold at an average price of $69.04, for a total transaction of $41,424.00. Following the transaction, the director now owns 496 shares in the company, valued at approximately $34,243.84. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is accessible through the SEC website. Insiders own 0.94% of the company’s stock.

Large investors have recently bought and sold shares of the company. Stratos Wealth Partners LTD. increased its holdings in shares of Compass Minerals International by 65.2% during the 1st quarter. Stratos Wealth Partners LTD. now owns 2,280 shares of the basic materials company’s stock worth $137,000 after purchasing an additional 900 shares during the period. Archford Capital Strategies LLC bought a new position in shares of Compass Minerals International during the 1st quarter worth about $158,000. CoreCommodity Management LLC acquired a new stake in shares of Compass Minerals International during the 4th quarter valued at about $167,000. Envestnet Asset Management Inc. boosted its position in shares of Compass Minerals International by 29.0% during the 1st quarter. Envestnet Asset Management Inc. now owns 3,248 shares of the basic materials company’s stock valued at $199,000 after acquiring an additional 730 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Landscape Capital Management L.L.C. acquired a new stake in shares of Compass Minerals International during the 4th quarter valued at about $220,000.

Compass Minerals International Company Profile

Compass Minerals International, Inc, produces and sells salt, and specialty plant nutrition and chemical products primarily in the United States, Canada, Brazil, and the United Kingdom. It operates in three segments: Salt, Plant Nutrition North America, and Plant Nutrition South America. The Salt segment offers sodium chloride and magnesium chloride, including rock salt, mechanically and solar evaporated salt, and brine and flake magnesium chloride products; and purchases potassium chloride and calcium chloride to sell as finished products or to blend with salt to produce specialty products.

To view ValuEngine’s full report, visit ValuEngine’s official website.

Analyst Recommendations for Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP)

Monday, June 25, 2018

Plexus Corp. (PLXS) Receives Average Rating of “Hold” from Brokerages

Plexus Corp. (NASDAQ:PLXS) has been given an average recommendation of “Hold” by the nine brokerages that are currently covering the stock, Marketbeat.com reports. Six analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, one has given a buy rating and one has issued a strong buy rating on the company. The average 12 month price target among brokers that have issued ratings on the stock in the last year is $60.75.

PLXS has been the topic of a number of analyst reports. Zacks Investment Research raised Plexus from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $72.00 price objective on the stock in a report on Thursday, March 22nd. JPMorgan Chase & Co. set a $70.00 target price on Plexus and gave the company a “hold” rating in a report on Friday, March 16th. BidaskClub raised Plexus from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Saturday, May 5th. TheStreet raised Plexus from a “c+” rating to a “b” rating in a report on Wednesday, April 25th. Finally, ValuEngine lowered Plexus from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Saturday, June 2nd.

Get Plexus alerts:

In other Plexus news, VP Ronnie Darroch sold 1,900 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, May 11th. The stock was sold at an average price of $59.22, for a total value of $112,518.00. Following the sale, the vice president now owns 9,918 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $587,343.96. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this link. Also, Director David J. Drury sold 5,000 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, June 1st. The shares were sold at an average price of $58.66, for a total value of $293,300.00. Following the completion of the sale, the director now directly owns 13,500 shares in the company, valued at approximately $791,910. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Company insiders own 3.70% of the company’s stock.

A number of institutional investors and hedge funds have recently added to or reduced their stakes in PLXS. Aperio Group LLC lifted its position in shares of Plexus by 16.8% in the 4th quarter. Aperio Group LLC now owns 14,762 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $896,000 after acquiring an additional 2,120 shares during the period. Teacher Retirement System of Texas bought a new stake in shares of Plexus in the 4th quarter worth approximately $702,000. California Public Employees Retirement System lifted its position in shares of Plexus by 2.7% in the 4th quarter. California Public Employees Retirement System now owns 89,134 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $5,412,000 after acquiring an additional 2,340 shares during the period. First Trust Advisors LP lifted its position in shares of Plexus by 5.4% in the 4th quarter. First Trust Advisors LP now owns 32,575 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $1,978,000 after acquiring an additional 1,673 shares during the period. Finally, Wells Fargo & Company MN lifted its position in shares of Plexus by 18.7% in the 4th quarter. Wells Fargo & Company MN now owns 64,672 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $3,927,000 after acquiring an additional 10,193 shares during the period. 96.43% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

Shares of NASDAQ PLXS opened at $61.66 on Monday. The company has a current ratio of 1.85, a quick ratio of 1.00 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.03. The stock has a market cap of $2.03 billion, a PE ratio of 19.03 and a beta of 0.84. Plexus has a 52 week low of $49.20 and a 52 week high of $66.78.

Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, April 25th. The technology company reported $0.74 EPS for the quarter, meeting the Zacks’ consensus estimate of $0.74. The business had revenue of $699.00 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $691.05 million. Plexus had a positive return on equity of 10.96% and a negative net margin of 1.19%. The firm’s revenue for the quarter was up 15.7% on a year-over-year basis. During the same quarter in the prior year, the firm posted $0.84 EPS. research analysts expect that Plexus will post 3.21 earnings per share for the current year.

About Plexus

Plexus Corp., together with its subsidiaries, provides electronic manufacturing services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific. It offers product conceptualization solutions; and product design and value-engineering solutions, including program management, feasibility studies, specification development for product features and functionality, circuit design, field programmable gate array design, printed circuit board layout, embedded software design, mechanical design, test specifications development and product verification testing, and automated production solutions and complex automation design.

Analyst Recommendations for Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS)

Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Buy Indiabulls Housing Finance; target of Rs 1600: Edelweiss


Edelweiss' research report on Indiabulls Housing Finance


We hosted an ��Investors Day�� with top management of Indiabulls Housing Finance (IHFL) to get insight into the company��s business dynamics and strategic plans. The interaction with management reinforced our conviction on the strong credit framework and risk management practices at IHFL. Moreover, the thrust on digitisation and productivity improvement coupled with emerging opportunities indicates that IHFL is making strides towards its FY20 targets (loan CAGR of >25%, cost/income <10%, and credit cost of <50bps). Given rising demand for housing finance and the company��s stringent risk mitigants and strong track record, execution risks are minimal in our view. Maintain ��BUY��.


Outlook


IHFL is envisaged to sustain superior return ratios��RoA and RoE of 2.8% and >30%��riding optimal product strategy with stringent risk mitigants, stable franchise and high liquidity. The stock is trading at 2.8x FY20 P/BV. Maintain ��BUY/SO��.


For all recommendations report, click here


Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on moneycontrol.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.

Read More First Published on Jun 20, 2018 05:37 pm

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch Right Now

tags:SPWH,MEIP,SBH,

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK) – Analysts at Jefferies Group boosted their Q2 2019 earnings per share estimates for shares of Chesapeake Energy in a research note issued to investors on Tuesday, May 15th. Jefferies Group analyst M. Lear now forecasts that the oil and gas exploration company will post earnings per share of $0.10 for the quarter, up from their prior estimate of $0.09. Jefferies Group also issued estimates for Chesapeake Energy’s Q1 2020 earnings at $0.22 EPS and FY2020 earnings at $0.86 EPS.

Get Chesapeake Energy alerts:

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK) last posted its earnings results on Wednesday, May 2nd. The oil and gas exploration company reported $0.34 EPS for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.25 by $0.09. The business had revenue of $1.24 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $1.30 billion. Chesapeake Energy had a net margin of 11.67% and a negative return on equity of 43.41%. During the same quarter last year, the firm posted $0.23 EPS. The company’s revenue for the quarter was down 15.4% on a year-over-year basis.

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch Right Now: Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.(SPWH)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    These are some of the news articles that may have impacted Accern Sentiment Analysis’s scoring:

    Get Sportsman's Warehouse alerts: William Blair Analysts Boost Earnings Estimates for Sportsman’s Warehouse Holdings Inc (SPWH) (americanbankingnews.com) DA Davidson Analysts Lower Earnings Estimates for Sportsman’s Warehouse Holdings Inc (SPWH) (americanbankingnews.com) Sportsman’s Warehouse rallies after earnings (seekingalpha.com) Edited Transcript of SPWH earnings conference call or presentation 24-May-18 12:30pm GMT (finance.yahoo.com) Sportsman’s (SPWH) CEO Jon Barker on Q1 2018 Results – Earnings Call Transcript (seekingalpha.com)

    SPWH has been the subject of several recent analyst reports. ValuEngine raised shares of Sportsman’s Warehouse from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Friday, April 27th. DA Davidson reaffirmed a “buy” rating on shares of Sportsman’s Warehouse in a research report on Wednesday, May 16th. Zacks Investment Research raised shares of Sportsman’s Warehouse from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Saturday, May 19th. Finally, Robert W. Baird reaffirmed a “neutral” rating and set a $5.00 price objective on shares of Sportsman’s Warehouse in a research report on Thursday, March 15th. Five research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and four have issued a buy rating to the company. The stock has an average rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $5.50.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Sportsman’s Warehouse (NASDAQ: SPWH) and Dicks Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Sportsman’s Warehouse Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:SPWH) Director Seidler Kutsenda Management Co sold 380,000 shares of the stock in a transaction on Tuesday, May 29th. The shares were sold at an average price of $5.14, for a total value of $1,953,200.00. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is available through the SEC website.

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch Right Now: MEI Pharma, Inc.(MEIP)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Money Morning News Team]

    Seadrill's rally demonstrates how profitable penny stocks can be for savvy investors. With Seadrill's gains already on the books, we'll look at a stock that's on track to generate tremendous returns – a small cap that just completed a groundbreaking acquisition with huge profit potential…

    Penny Stock Current Share Price Law Week's Gain Seadrill Ltd. (NYSE: SDRL) $0.58 98.74% Vivis Inc. (Nasdaq: VVUS) $0.83 59.97% MEI Pharma Inc. (Nasdaq: MEIP) $3.45 43.40% Transenterix Inc. (NYSE: TRXC) $3.15 35.72% Akers Biosciences Inc. (Nasdaq: AKER) $0.65 34.38% Galectin Therapeutics Inc. (Nasdaq: GALT) $4.54 32.58% Phoenix New Media Ltd. (NYSE ADR: FENG) $5.65 32.22% Heat Biologics Inc. (Nasdaq: HTBX) $1.73 31.37% Bright Scholar Education Ltd. (NYSE ADR: BEDU) $18.51 29.03% 21 Vianet Group Inc. (Nasdaq: VNET) $7.36 28.72%

    These gains are incredibly exciting. However, not all penny stocks are equally strong investments.

  • [By Lisa Levin] Gainers Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (NASDAQ: CLWT) shares climbed 70.3 percent to $5.45 after reporting 2017 year-end results. MEDIGUS Ltd/S ADR (NASDAQ: MDGS) surged 39.8 percent to $1.58 in reaction to its Monday announcement of a distribution agreement. The medical device company said it reached an agreement to distribute its minimally invasive medical devices in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: RKDA) gained 25.6 percent to $11.50. Arcadia Biosciences reported that Albert D. Bolles, Ph.D. has joined its board of directors. Aytu Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ: AYTU) shares jumped 21.8 percent to $0.4798 after the company late Monday reported lighter-than-expected Q1 loss. Hollysys Automation Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: HOLI) shares gained 21.1 percent to $26.77 following Q3 results. Pfenex Inc. (NYSE: PFNX) rose 16.8 percent to $7.1271 after the company announced the positive top-line PF708 study results in Osteoporosis patients that showed no imbalances in severity or incidence of adverse events. MEI Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: MEIP) rose 13.8 percent to $2.88. Red Violet, Inc. (NASDAQ: RDVT) jumped 13.1 percent to $6.41 after reporting Q1 results. SORL Auto Parts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SORL) shares gained 12 percent to $5.87 after reporting upbeat Q1 results. Bovie Medical Corporation (NYSE: BVX) gained 8.4 percent to $3.96 after reporting a first-quarter sales beat. Rosehill Resources Inc. (NASDAQ: ROSE) surged 8.4 percent to $7.90 after announcing Q1 results. LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) rose 8.1 percent to $0.5171 following Q1 results. ProPhase Labs, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRPH) rose 7.7 percent to $5.6103 following Q1 results. Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NYSE: NINE) shares climbed 7.4 percent to $35.90. Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: XENE) rose 6.7 percent to $6.40 after the company presented XEN901 Phase 1 clinical update and XEN1101 TMS pharmacodynamic Phase 1 data. MYnd
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Headlines about MEI Pharma (NASDAQ:MEIP) have been trending somewhat negative on Friday, according to Accern. Accern ranks the sentiment of press coverage by reviewing more than twenty million blog and news sources. Accern ranks coverage of companies on a scale of -1 to 1, with scores nearest to one being the most favorable. MEI Pharma earned a coverage optimism score of -0.06 on Accern’s scale. Accern also gave media stories about the company an impact score of 45.5534769772513 out of 100, meaning that recent press coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an effect on the company’s share price in the near term.

  • [By Lisa Levin] Gainers Red Violet, Inc. (NASDAQ: RDVT) rose 75.31 percent to close at $9.94 after reporting Q1 results. Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (NASDAQ: CLWT) shares jumped 40.62 percent to close at $4.50 on Tuesday after reporting 2017 year-end results. MEI Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: MEIP) gained 34.39 percent to close at $3.40. MEDIGUS Ltd/S ADR (NASDAQ: MDGS) gained 32.74 percent to close at $1.50 in reaction to its Monday announcement of a distribution agreement. The medical device company said it reached an agreement to distribute its minimally invasive medical devices in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Pfenex Inc. (NYSE: PFNX) surged 31.15 percent to close at $8.00 after the company announced the positive top-line PF708 study results in Osteoporosis patients that showed no imbalances in severity or incidence of adverse events. Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: RKDA) rose 21.07 percent to close at $11.09. Arcadia Biosciences reported that Albert D. Bolles, Ph.D. has joined its board of directors. Genprex, Inc. (NASDAQ: GNPX) rose 20.23 percent to close at $10.58. Turtle Beach Corporation (NASDAQ: HEAR) shares gained 17.62 percent to close at $17.82. Aptevo Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: APVO) rose 17.1 percent to close at $5.82. Phoenix New Media Limited (NYSE: FENG) shares jumped 16.23 percent to close at $4.87 following Q1 earnings. Stein Mart, Inc. (NASDAQ: SMRT) rose 16.04 percent to close at $3.69. PPDAI Group Inc. (NASDAQ: PPDF) climbed 15.99 percent to close at $7.98 following Q1 results. Tyme Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: TYME) rose 15.93 percent to close at $3.42. LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) gained 15.59 percent to close at $0.5532 following Q1 results. Sophiris Bio, Inc. (NASDAQ: SPHS) gained 13.92 percent to close at $3.52 on Tuesday following Q1 results. Euroseas Ltd. (NASDAQ: ESEA) jumped 13.4 percent to close at $2.37. Iteris, Inc. (NASDAQ: ITI) shares surged 13.05 percent to close

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch Right Now: Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.(SBH)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Secoo (NASDAQ: SECO) and Sally Beauty (NYSE:SBH) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    BMO Capital Markets set a $16.00 price target on Sally Beauty (NYSE:SBH) in a report published on Friday. The firm currently has a hold rating on the specialty retailer’s stock.

  • [By WWW.GURUFOCUS.COM]

    For the details of ARISTOTLE FUND LP's stock buys and sells, go to http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName=ARISTOTLE+FUND+LP

    These are the top 5 holdings of ARISTOTLE FUND LPTravelport Worldwide Ltd (TVPT) - 1,811,100 shares, 32.82% of the total portfolio. Shares added by 0.67%Web.com Group Inc (WEB) - 993,000 shares, 19.94% of the total portfolio. JC Penney Co Inc (JCP) - 4,739,000 shares, 15.87% of the total portfolio. Shares added by 420.20%Office Depot Inc (ODP) - 5,243,000 shares, 12.5% of the total portfolio. Shares added by 21.70%Sally Beauty Holdings Inc (SBH) - 596,900 shares, 10.89% o
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Sally Beauty Holdings (NYSE:SBH) saw a large growth in short interest during the month of April. As of April 30th, there was short interest totalling 27,233,251 shares, a growth of 11.8% from the April 13th total of 24,366,212 shares. Based on an average trading volume of 1,543,876 shares, the days-to-cover ratio is currently 17.6 days. Currently, 21.9% of the company’s shares are sold short.

Friday, June 1, 2018

If bitcoin is a bubble, the ��panic�� stage is near: economist

It isn��t uncommon for crypto-skeptics to look a bitcoin chart and, without much analysis, label it the tulip bubble of the 21st century.

But economists note that bubbles are complex things, with a life cycle of their own.

According to the late Hyman Minsky, the U.S. economist whose theories on financial fragility came to the fore during the 2008 financial crisis when a surge in private debt accumulation led to the collapse in the housing market, an asset bubble has five stages; displacement, boom, euphoria, profit-taking, and panic.

Using this framework, Joost van der Burgt, a policy adviser at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, said that if bitcoin

Tuesday, May 29, 2018

ShotSpotter Rated a Buy: What You Need to Know

Every day, Wall Street analysts upgrade some stocks, downgrade others, and "initiate coverage" on a few more. But do these analysts even know what they're talking about? Today, we're taking one high-profile Wall Street pick and putting it under the microscope...

Another week, another school shooting. According to data compiled by CNN, the first 21 weeks of 2018 have seen no fewer than 23 shooting incidents at U.S. schools -- an average of more than one per week, and that doesn't even count shootings outside of schools. (And 2018 isn't even half over yet.)

What's the solution to gun violence in America?

Different scenarios to different kinds of gun-related problems have been proposed, including putting metal detectors (or police officers) in schools, putting body cameras on police, and�tightening regulations on gun ownership. One palliative measure that's starting to gain attention on Wall Street, though, is to at the very least decrease the response time to shooting incidents, by making gunshots easier to detect and localize.

Gunshot detection company and recent IPO ShotSpotter (NASDAQ:SSTI) is arguably taking the lead in that effort -- and today, ShotSpotter stock is winning another buy rating on Wall Street.

Sonar screen

SpotShotter spots the shot -- and Wall Street spots a bargain. Image source: Getty Images.

What is ShotSpotter?

If you haven't heard the name before, that's no surprise. ShotSpotter has been a publicly traded company for less than a year. The stock's initial public offering was on the Nasdaq last June, and it quickly notched a 26% gain on its first day of trading. It's more than doubled since.

ShotSpotter calls itself the "leader in gunshot detection solutions," using multiple sensors�placed at multiple locations to triangulate the location of a gunshot from the sound it radiates. ShotSpotter offers three main products�through a software-as-a-service business model, through which customers subscribe to the company's detection services: ShotSpotter Flex for generalized detection of gunshots outdoors, SST SecureCampus for school and university customers, and ShotSpotter SiteSecure for securing other discrete locations such as airports and train stations.

ShotSpotter competes�with larger, better-funded companies -- such as Raytheon, Thales, and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems -- that offer similar technology. But as ShotSpotter explains in its 10-K filings with the SEC, these companies "are not direct competitors." ShotSpotter's suite of systems provides "immediate and precise data on gunfire" over "large and geographically diverse areas." In contrast, the competitors ShotSpotter identifies stick mainly to offering "limited scope point protection, also known as 'counter-sniper systems'" used by the military and SWAT teams.

How is ShotSpotter doing?

ShotSpotter last reported earnings�on May 8, showing 51% year-over-year growth in sales to $6.9 million, 11 points of gross margin expansion (now 52%), but a net loss of $0.12 per diluted share.

That last number is disappointing, but consider the progress ShotSpotter has made over its short history:

Over the past couple of years, S&P Global Market Intelligence data show that the company's sales have more than doubled (to $26.1 million on a trailing-12-month basis) while gross margin has nearly doubled as well (to 54% on the same basis). Operating profit margin, while still negative, is becoming steadily less so, improving from negative 46.8% in 2015 to negative 13.7% over the last 12 months. Likewise, net profit margin has improved from negative 52.5% two years ago to negative 36.9% over the past year.

Yes, most of these numbers remain in negative territory. But as revenue rises, ShotSpotter is getting closer and closer to breaking even and turning a profit -- and in its earnings report earlier this month, ShotSpotter raised guidance on revenue for this year, predicting it will end 2018 with sales of between $33 million and $34 million.

If ShotSpotter hits even the low end of its guidance range, that would work out to 39% sales growth year over year.

What analysts are saying

Analysts at Imperial Capital and Dougherty & Company both found these results (and guidance) encouraging enough to raise their target prices on ShotSpotter stock after earnings, to $35 a share and $41.50 per share, respectively, according to data from StreetInsider.com�(requires subscription). This morning, Lake Street Capital became the third analyst to give ShotSpotter a vote of confidence, initiating coverage on the stock with a buy rating and assigning a price target of $36 per share (ShotSpotter shares currently trade for less than $29 apiece).

In its note, covered on TheFly.com this morning, Lake Street predicts that ShotSpotter will "show 30%-plus revenue growth and emerging profitability over the next three years" and has a "long runway for growth" thereafter as law enforcement continue to search for solutions to gun violence.

That prognosis tallies with what the rest of Wall Street is looking for -- sales growth of 40% this year, 33% next year, and 36% the year after that. Analysts hope to see ShotSpotter turn its first quarterly profit in Q4 of this year, show a full-year profit ($0.18 per share) next year, and quintuple that to $1.05 per share in 2020, according to S&P Global figures.

If those numbers prove out, then ShotSpotter stock at 28 times 2020 profits, and growing at 30% or better, could be ripe for investment today.

Friday, May 25, 2018

How Facebook (FB) Stock Fared During the Cambridge Analytica Scandal

Almost everyone, investors and otherwise, has heard in some way, shape, or form of the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal. Captivating national audiences, the scandal caused strong fluctuations in Facebook (FB ) stock. With the storm behind us, now is the time to look into how the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal affected Facebook, and what it spells out for the future.

Background

The premise of the scandal surrounds a 2014 personality-quiz app made by Cambridge University lab researcher Aleksander Kogan. After individuals downloaded the app, it asked for users’ Facebook information, then accessing information on user’s friends, and saving it in a private database. After collecting 50 million Facebook users’ information, Cambridge Analytica made 30 million “psychographic” profiles about voters.

Cambridge Analytica has strong connections to individuals close to President Trump, and things were made worse when security footage of Alexander Nix, CEO of the company, offering to bribe global public officials emerged.

To further deepen the hole, Cambridge Analytica implemented these profiles about voters to create targeted ads for both Ted Cruz’s and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.

Timeline

The issue was thought to be resolved in 2014 with rule changes made by Facebook to restrict the power a developer had in terms of user data acquisition. This rule was never actively implemented, and Kogan kept the data he had collected from his app.

In December of 2015, The Guardian released a highly publicized article that took the media by storm. Share prices plummeted 9.5% in one month up until mid-January.

Then, going into the presidential election, Trump’s team invested heavily in Facebook ads linked to Cambridge Analytica. In March of this year, both The Guardian and New York Times published articles exposing that nearly 50 million Facebook profiles were used to influence individuals voting for the presidential election and Brexit decision.

Following the reports, the FTC launched an investigation into Facebook as to whether or not the company broke privacy protection policy, all while pushing Zuckerberg to testify in front of Congress. After continued pressure, Zuckerberg released an apologetic statement at the end of March and testified in mid-April. In one month during the span of these events, Facebook share prices dropped 11%.

Amidst hearings, Facebook released their Q1 2018 earnings report, in which the firm outperformed expectations. This, along with the recent announcement that all political ads on Facebook and Instagram have to be saved to a public archive in hopes of reducing questionable activity, has contributed to the company’s comeback. From mid-April to date, share prices have gone up 16%, lifting year-to-date gains to 5.4%.

Future

With Facebook restoring their public image and security, the company has made an almost-full recovery. It is now back on track with normal business activities and looking to continue with its current success this year.

“Despite facing important challenges, our community and business are off to a strong start in 2018…We are taking a broader view of our responsibility and investing to make sure our services are used for good. But we also need to keep building new tools to help people connect, strengthen our communities, and bring the world closer together” said CEO Mark Zuckerberg in a recent earnings release.

Wall Street’s Next Amazon

Zacks EVP Kevin Matras believes this familiar stock has only just begun its climb to become one of the greatest investments of all time. It’s a once-in-a-generation opportunity to invest in pure genius.

Click for details >>

Thursday, May 24, 2018

Brokerages Set British American Tobacco (BATS) Target Price at $5,430.36

Shares of British American Tobacco (LON:BATS) have received an average rating of “Buy” from the seventeen brokerages that are presently covering the company, MarketBeat.com reports. Seven research analysts have rated the stock with a hold recommendation and ten have issued a buy recommendation on the company. The average 12-month price target among analysts that have covered the stock in the last year is GBX 5,430.36 ($72.86).

A number of equities research analysts have commented on the company. Goldman Sachs upped their price target on British American Tobacco from GBX 5,600 ($75.14) to GBX 5,850 ($78.49) and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Wednesday, February 7th. Jefferies Group reiterated a “buy” rating on shares of British American Tobacco in a research report on Tuesday, May 8th. Citigroup reiterated a “neutral” rating on shares of British American Tobacco in a research report on Thursday, March 1st. Credit Suisse Group reiterated an “outperform” rating and issued a GBX 5,800 ($77.82) price target on shares of British American Tobacco in a research report on Monday, January 29th. Finally, JPMorgan Chase reiterated an “overweight” rating and issued a GBX 5,610 ($75.27) price target on shares of British American Tobacco in a research report on Thursday, February 22nd.

Get British American Tobacco alerts:

In related news, insider Naresh Sethi sold 13,597 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, March 27th. The stock was sold at an average price of GBX 3,943 ($52.90), for a total transaction of 拢536,129.71 ($719,347.52). Also, insider Richard Burrows bought 4,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, February 22nd. The shares were acquired at an average price of GBX 4,236 ($56.84) per share, for a total transaction of 拢169,440 ($227,344.69). In the last 90 days, insiders have sold 24,900 shares of company stock worth $99,795,847.

Shares of BATS stock opened at GBX 3,813 ($51.16) on Friday. British American Tobacco has a twelve month low of GBX 4,064 ($54.53) and a twelve month high of GBX 5,643.60 ($75.72).

The firm also recently announced a dividend, which was paid on Wednesday, May 9th. Investors of record on Thursday, March 22nd were given a dividend of GBX 48.80 ($0.65) per share. This is a positive change from British American Tobacco’s previous dividend of $43.60. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Thursday, March 22nd. This represents a dividend yield of 1.09%.

About British American Tobacco

British American Tobacco p.l.c. provides cigarettes and other tobacco products worldwide. It manufactures vapour and tobacco heating products; oral tobacco and nicotine products, such as snus and moist snuff; cigars; and e-cigarettes. The company offers its products under the Dunhill, Kent, Lucky Strike, Pall Mall, Rothmans, Vogue, Viceroy, Kool, Peter Stuyvesant, Craven A, Benson & Hedges, John Player Gold Leaf, State Express 555, and Shuang Xi brands.

Analyst Recommendations for British American Tobacco (LON:BATS)

Monday, May 21, 2018

Eaton Vance Management Acquires 12,138 Shares of Legg Mason (LM)

Eaton Vance Management grew its holdings in Legg Mason (NYSE:LM) by 9.0% in the first quarter, HoldingsChannel reports. The institutional investor owned 147,570 shares of the asset manager’s stock after acquiring an additional 12,138 shares during the period. Eaton Vance Management’s holdings in Legg Mason were worth $5,999,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

Other large investors have also modified their holdings of the company. Advisors Preferred LLC purchased a new position in shares of Legg Mason in the 4th quarter worth $162,000. Bessemer Group Inc. grew its stake in shares of Legg Mason by 219.1% in the 4th quarter. Bessemer Group Inc. now owns 4,499 shares of the asset manager’s stock worth $189,000 after buying an additional 3,089 shares in the last quarter. Zurcher Kantonalbank Zurich Cantonalbank grew its stake in shares of Legg Mason by 47.5% in the 4th quarter. Zurcher Kantonalbank Zurich Cantonalbank now owns 4,711 shares of the asset manager’s stock worth $198,000 after buying an additional 1,518 shares in the last quarter. Murphy Pohlad Asset Management LLC purchased a new position in shares of Legg Mason in the 4th quarter worth $205,000. Finally, State of Alaska Department of Revenue purchased a new position in shares of Legg Mason in the 4th quarter worth $247,000. 93.88% of the stock is owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.

Get Legg Mason alerts:

In related news, EVP Patricia Lattin sold 898 shares of Legg Mason stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, May 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $38.95, for a total transaction of $34,977.10. Following the completion of the sale, the executive vice president now owns 41,445 shares in the company, valued at approximately $1,614,282.75. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at this link. Also, VP Thomas C. Merchant sold 2,537 shares of Legg Mason stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, May 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $38.80, for a total transaction of $98,435.60. Following the sale, the vice president now owns 65,940 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $2,558,472. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold a total of 34,771 shares of company stock valued at $1,349,563 in the last quarter. 12.70% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.

A number of equities analysts have commented on the stock. Credit Suisse Group lifted their price objective on shares of Legg Mason from $52.00 to $53.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a research note on Thursday, April 26th. Morgan Stanley dropped their price target on shares of Legg Mason from $42.00 to $40.00 and set an “underweight” rating for the company in a research note on Tuesday, April 10th. Deutsche Bank lifted their price target on shares of Legg Mason from $46.00 to $49.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday, April 6th. Citigroup reaffirmed a “neutral” rating and set a $50.00 price target (up from $49.00) on shares of Legg Mason in a research note on Thursday, January 25th. Finally, Zacks Investment Research cut shares of Legg Mason from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note on Tuesday, April 17th. Three analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, six have assigned a hold rating and three have assigned a buy rating to the company. Legg Mason has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus price target of $47.10.

Legg Mason opened at $39.05 on Friday, Marketbeat Ratings reports. Legg Mason has a 12 month low of $36.24 and a 12 month high of $47.13. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.58, a current ratio of 1.98 and a quick ratio of 1.41. The stock has a market cap of $3.30 billion, a P/E ratio of 11.76, a PEG ratio of 0.60 and a beta of 2.06.

Legg Mason (NYSE:LM) last released its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, April 25th. The asset manager reported $0.86 EPS for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.71 by $0.15. Legg Mason had a net margin of 11.21% and a return on equity of 7.81%. The firm had revenue of $785.10 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $755.98 million. During the same period in the previous year, the company earned $0.76 EPS. The firm’s revenue for the quarter was up 8.6% compared to the same quarter last year. research analysts expect that Legg Mason will post 3.62 earnings per share for the current year.

The business also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Monday, July 9th. Investors of record on Tuesday, June 12th will be issued a dividend of $0.34 per share. This is a positive change from Legg Mason’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.28. The ex-dividend date is Monday, June 11th. This represents a $1.36 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 3.48%. Legg Mason’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently 30.11%.

Legg Mason Profile

Legg Mason, Inc is a publicly owned asset management holding company. Through its subsidiaries, the firm provides investment management and related services to company-sponsored mutual funds and other investment vehicles including pension funds, foundations, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies, private banks, family offices, individuals, as well as to global, institutional, and retail clients.

Want to see what other hedge funds are holding LM? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Legg Mason (NYSE:LM).

Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Legg Mason (NYSE:LM)

Sunday, May 20, 2018

J.C. Penney (JCP) Q1 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble with words 'Fool Transcripts' below it

Image source: The Motley Fool.

J.C. Penney (NYSE:JCP) Q1 2018 Earnings Conference CallMay. 17, 2018 8:30 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q1 2018 JCPenney earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session, and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator instructions] I would like to introduce your host for today's conference, Trent Kruse.�You may begin.

Trent Kruse -- Investor Relations

All right, thank you, Kevin, and good morning, everyone. As a reminder, the presentation this morning includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which reflects the company's current view of future events and financial performance. The words expect, plan, anticipate, believe and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and the company's future results of operations could differ materially from historical results or current expectations for more details on these risks, please refer to the company's Form 10-K and other SEC filings.

Please note that no portion of this presentation may be rebroadcast in any form without the prior written consent of JCPenney. For those listening after May 17, 2018, please note that this presentation will not be updated, and it is possible that the information discussed will no longer be current. Also, supplemental reference slides are available on our Investor Relations website. While management will not be speaking directly to these slides, these slides are meant to facilitate your review of the company's results and to be used as a reference document following the call.

Joining us on today's call are Marvin Ellison, chairman and CEO of JCPenney; and Jeff Davis, our CFO. Following our prepared remarks, we look forward to taking your questions. And with that, I'll now turn the call over to our chairman and CEO, Marvin Ellison.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

All right. Thank you, Trent. Good morning, everyone. We had a strong start to the first quarter, with February and March comps ahead of our annual guidance range.

However, our April results were negatively impacted by unseasonable weather, resulting in a sales comp increase of 0.2% for the quarter. Overall, we're confident that our strategic plan is working, and this is evidenced by the sales recovery we experienced in the final two weeks of April when the temperatures began to normalize. The first quarter can be summarized in five key points. No.

1, we saw continued strength in our beauty segment, led by Sephora, fine jewelry, and our salon business. No. 2, we had great performance in our home refresh initiatives, specifically appliances, furniture, and mattress. No.

3, we experienced a return to positive sales performance in men's apparel. No. 4,�we're pleased with the continued revenue growth in our omnichannel business. And finally, unseasonably cool temperatures in early April negatively impacted overall apparel comps and gross margin.

In fact, without the impact of weather, we estimate our comp sales would have been a plus 1.5% for the quarter. Despite the short-term weather impact in April, we're maintaining our annual guidance of flat to up 2%. We have an expectation it will continue to benefit from our home refresh and beauty growth initiatives as well as the ongoing enhancements in apparel. In addition, we're very encouraged that our May month-to-date sales performance exceeds the high end of our sales forecast.

Now let me discuss briefly gross margin. As you know, it's critical for us to improve the performance of our apparel categories to not only deliver improved top-line results but to deliver better margin performance. And Jeff will discuss specific actions that we're taking to improve gross margin in the remaining three quarters of 2018. I'll take a little bit of time to add some color to our Q1 margin performance.

So for the quarter, there were three major factors that negatively impacted our gross margin performance. First and most significant to our gross margin impact occurred within our dot.com business. We experienced mix, supply chain, and process issues that negatively impacted enterprise gross margin. All these issues have been identified, and process improvements are under way.

Second, we executed store clearance markdowns to address slow-selling apparel categories. We're committed to running the business for the long run and not just the quarter. So having said that, we took appropriate markdowns and pricing actions in the first quarter to address slow-moving inventory and make room for new product. And third, our negative comp performance in women's and kid's apparel created gross margin pressure.

We can correlate 100% of the negative comps in kid's and women's apparel to unseasonally cool temperatures in early April. Gross margin improvement is a major focus for the company, and Jeff will outline specific strategic steps we're taking to improve performance for the balance of 2018. And in spite of the challenging margin performance we experienced, I'm pleased that we are maintaining our great expense reduction discipline, which is evidenced by a 270 basis point reduction in SG&A versus last year. It's also important to note that many of our key growth initiatives are centered around lower-margin rate businesses.

However, we see the importance of incremental profit dollars in these initiatives. And in the near term, our ability to drive margin rate improvement falls largely on delivering consistent sales growth in higher-margin categories, including apparel, fine jewelry, and soft home while ensuring we drive operational efficiency in our dot-com business. As we've discussed in the past, we're placing a greater emphasis on apparel. And in the quarter, we drove improved sequential performance in many of our women's categories across total women's apparel.

We're also encouraged with the return of positive sales comps in our overall men's apparel business. Because apparel and activewear will become a larger piece of our business in upcoming quarters, the improvements we've made in these categories bode well for the balance of 2018. Growth in our activewear area will be driven by enhancements in our partnership with Nike, Adidas, Champion, and Puma. And we're very excited about the upcoming launch of our Fanatics fan shops in 700 stores this summer.

I'll now hand the call over to Jeff to discuss in more detail our first-quarter financial results as well as outline our updated guidance for 2018. I will come back and close our prepared remarks with highlights of some of the key initiatives for the balance of 2018. Jeff?

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Marvin, and good morning, everyone.Before I begin, I want to remind you that starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we implemented and accounted for new FASB revenue-recognition standards and changes to pension accounting and have changed the current-year and prior-year presentation of our financial statements. Please refer to the most recently filed 10-K for a complete understanding of the accounting of financial statement presentation changes related to our adoption of these new accounting pronouncements. Now let's turn to our first-quarter financial results. For the first quarter, total net sales decreased 4.3% versus last year while comp sales increased 0.2%.

As a reminder, the 450-basis-point spread between total net sales and comp sales was primarily due to the 141 stores closures in fiscal 2017, most of which were closing late in the second quarter. The comp-sales improvement for the quarter was driven by an increase in average unit retail and units per transaction. Geographically, the Gulf Coast and Southeast were our better-performing regions while the Midwest and Northeast were our most challenged regions. Starting this quarter, credit income is now included in total revenues.

Recall, credit income was previously reported as an offset to SG&A in prior periods. For the first quarter, credit income was $87 million, compared to $83 million the first quarter of last year. Jewelry, Sephora, men's, and salon comped positive in Q1. All divisions, except one specialty, comped positive for the combined February-March period.

As Marvin mentioned in his opening remarks, our comp sales results for the quarter were impacted by cooler-than-normal temperatures in April. The quarter started off solid with comp sales for the combined February and March period, above the high end of our full-year guided range. While April comps ended down an unexpected mid-single digit, we delivered significant positive comps in the last two weeks of the quarter when the weather began to normalize. Cost of goods sold for the first quarter was 66.3% of sales, an increase of 240 basis points compared to the same period last year.

As Marvin mentioned earlier, gross margin is a major focus for the company. So looking ahead to Q2 and the back half of the year, the following gross margin initiatives gives us confidence that we can see improvement for the balance of the year, continued execution of pricing analytics and markdown optimization; efficient purchase and allocation of inventory based on sales volume versus square footage; and enhanced e-commerce channel to drive greater profitability through improved operational disciplines and continued sales improvement across higher-margin apparel categories, namely women's. Moving now to expenses. SG&A expenses for the quarter were $826 million, or 33% of sales, compared to $938 million, or 34.7% of sales, for the same period last year.

The reduction in expenses was primarily driven by optimizing controllable costs in more efficient marketing. In addition, as we discussed on our last call, the remaining amortization of $30 million gain on the sale of a leasehold interest last year was recorded as a reduction of SG&A expenses. Turning now to our adoption of new accounting standards. As I mentioned earlier, we implemented new FASB accounting pronouncements starting in the first quarter.

The impact of full-year adjusted earnings related to the new revenue recognition standards is expected to be approximately $7 million, or $0.02 per share. In addition, given the new FASB standard associated with pension accounting, we now include the current service cost component of pension expense and income in SG&A. The net impact to full-year adjusted earnings related to the adoption of this standard, the majority of which is related to the service component -- cost component is expected to total approximately $32 million, or $0.10 per share. All other components of net periodic pension costs and income are now recorded in a separate line item below operating income.

It is important to note service costs do not impact our operating cash flow, and it is funded through the pension trust. The pension plan has a current funded status of approximately 102%, and we do not expect to make any cash contributions for the foreseeable future. Interest expense was $78 million this quarter, versus $87 million last year. During the first quarter, we completed the sale of our Milwaukee, Wisconsin, distribution facility and recorded a gain of $12.5 million.

In total, we recorded net real estate gains of approximately $17 million, or $0.05 a share, in the first quarter of this year, compared to $117 million, or $0.38 per share, last year related to the sale of our Buena Park distribution facility in the first quarter of last year. Now let's turn to our capital structure, our liquidity position, and our balance sheet. In February, we used available cash on hand to retire at maturity $190 million of notes due February 15, 2018. During the quarter, we also issued $400 million in senior secured second-priority notes due 2025.

We used the net proceeds from this transaction to successfully complete a tender offer for $375 million of aggregate principal amount of our outstanding unsecured 2019 and 2020 bonds. As a result, we now only have $50 million of debt maturing in October of 2019 and $110 million maturing in June of 2020. Our capital-allocation priority remains to deleverage the balance sheet through debt retirement at maturity or proactive refinancing and to rebuild cash balances. We remain confident to fund near-term maturities from free cash flow.

As expected and given the $190 million in cash utilized early in the quarter to retire the February notes, we drew against our credit facility during the quarter to fund a portion of our seasonal working capital needs. We ended the quarter with an outstanding balance of $351 million. As such, our liquidity position at the end of the first quarter was approximately $2 billion. Cash and cash-equivalents at the end of the first quarter were $181 million, which was $182 million less than the end of the first quarter last year.

Our reduced cash position is primarily attributable to the February $190 million debt repayment. In addition, capital expenditures, net of landlord allowances, for the quarter were $103 million. During the first quarter, free cash flow was a use of cash of $421 million, an increase of $128 million, compared to last year's use of cash of $293 million. Inventory at the end of the first quarter was approximately $2.9 billion, down 1.4% versus last year and up 2.6% on a comp-store-inventory basis.

The increase in comp inventory is primarily related to floor samples associated with additional appliance and mattress showrooms and the expansion of extended sizes in active's assortment. Our teams remain committed to effectively manage the inventory levels without sacrificing customer availability. We recently appointed a new Senior Vice President of Planning and Allocation, who comes to us with a strong retail background in P&A. Under her leadership, we will enhance our focus to better assess the effectiveness of our inventory position and make informed decisions on inventory productivity and improve our planning and forecast capabilities.

Merchandise accounts payable was $933 million, up $40 million versus the first quarter of last year. The increase was primarily due to the timing of receipts. Turning now to the fiscal 2018 guidance and the update to adjusted earnings per share we announced earlier this morning. Starting this quarter, we implemented new FASB revenue recognition standards and changes in pension accounting.

As such, we are updating our full-year guidance for fiscal 2018 to only include the previous mentioned $0.02 impact from the revenue recognition items and the $0.10 impact from pension-related costs to our adjusted earnings. Our new guidance is as follows, we expect comp store sales to remain in the range of flat to up 2%, and adjusted earnings per share is now expected to be in the range of a negative $0.07 to a positive $0.13 per share. Now moving to other key financial metrics and expectations for our Q2 of 2018. Comp sales in the second quarter are expected to be in the middle of our annual guidance range.

We expect second-quarter cost of goods sold to decrease compared to last year. SG&A dollars in Q2 are expected to be down versus last year. In closing, we remain focused in 2018 on improving inventory turns to increase free cash flow and improve margins and delivering greater operating productivity. With that, I'll now turn it back over to Marvin.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Jeff. We'll remain focused on executing our three-part strategic framework of private brands, omnichannel and increasing revenue per customer. We have key initiatives in place that give us confidence in our ability to achieve our 2018 financial objectives. First, as we've already discussed, a key focus this year is enhancing our apparel offering to better align with customer preferences.

We'll remain focused on categories that offer the greatest opportunity for growth, particularly special sizes, activewear, dresses, contemporary and casual sportswear. Specific to special sizes, we're pleased with the performance of our plus-size Liz Claiborne brand. And we're also very excited about our partnership with Shaquille O'Neal, who is the definition of big and tall. We believe that JCPenney can leverage our unique position in the marketplace to achieve $100 million growth opportunity in special sizes in 2018.

Our second key area is beauty. We have a significant opportunity to leverage our total beauty experience. One of the critical components of our beauty strategy is our continued best-in-class partnership with Sephora. After opening 70 new Sephora locations in 2017 and adding 27 more this year, Sephora inside JCPenney shops will operate in over 75% of our stores.

We're also excited about a series of new launches and brand expansions that we have planned in Sephora for 2018. We'll keep you updated on the timing and successes of these launches on future calls. Also in 2018, we plan to rebrand and remodel another 100 salons to Salon by InStyle. And as a reminder, when we remodel a salon, the sales performance in these salons improve, on average, 400 basis points.

Additionally, fine jewelry is a key component of our beauty strategy, and our jewelry business comped positively in every quarter in 2017 and was the highest comping division in Q1. Our jewelry business is bringing a new and younger customer to JCPenney, and we have aggressive plans for the balance of 2018. And finally, we recently partnered with Fit Bit to introduce a line of health and wellness products into our assortment. We're in the early stages of this new partnership, and we look forward to expanding the health and wellness areas of the JCPenney business.

JCPenney is the only retail that can offer our customers a total beauty experience combining Sephora, salon, and fine jewelry under the same roof. And third, we are continuing our commitment to becoming a world-class omnichannel retailer. And although we experienced some process challenges that impacted gross margin in Q1, we're pleased that today, approximately 80% of our existing inventory is now eligible for free same-day pickup, 100% of our brick-and-mortar store network is being utilized for online fulfillment and nearly 40% of our dot.com orders are picked up in the store. And while in the store, over 1/3 of the customers make an additional purchase.

Through an enhanced collaboration across all digital functions, we're merging our e-commerce operations with the latest innovation in IT to ensure that our omnichannel strategy enables JCPenney to be a high-performing, fully integrated digital enterprise. And finally, we continue to position JCPenney to take market share from ailing competitors. One area where we see significant share capture opportunity is in our Home refresh categories. Over 70% of our customers are homeowners, and we have a large competitor in the space donating market share.

This is arguably the most challenging and competitive retail market that we've seen in over 50 years. And over the past three years, we've taken significant steps to derisk our business and improve our balance sheet. Specifically, reducing outstanding debt levels and proactively refinancing. These financial improvements have stabilized our company and position JCPenney to take advantage of available market share opportunities as other retailers continue to struggle.

To that point, we have identified over 300 malls where we will aggressively pursue sales opportunities given to us by other retailers in 2018. And the vast majority of these malls are highly rated and will provide incredible market share opportunities as we continue to enhance our merchandise assortment, which includes appliances, mattress, furniture and workwear. In addition, we see opportunities to capture market share in baby gifts, footwear and our new toy category based on the competitive dynamics. In closing, retail in the U.S.

is a multitrillion-dollar industry, and we believe there could be multiple winners. Those retailers who can offer their customers a value while providing the best in-store and online experience will be winners. And as a company, JCPenney plans to be one of those winners. So Kevin, with that, we'll open the line for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from Lorraine Hutchinson with Bank of America.

Lorraine Hutchinson -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Thank you. Good morning. Can you give us an update on your free cash flow guidance? Are you reiterating that this morning? And then secondly if you could just talk a little bit about the opportunity to reduce the levels of inventory in your stores and how much cash you think that could drive over the next few years.

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Hi, good morning, Lorraine. This is Jeff. So we are continuing to reiterate our free cash flow guidance for the year in the range of $200 million to $300 million. As it relates to the inventory, we do believe that we have an ongoing opportunity to induce -- reduce our inventory levels.

If you take a look at our weeks of supply on hand, there's definitely an opportunity for us. We have not provided any guidance as to what that amount would be over the course of the year. But we are working very carefully and very diligently with the new individual that I had mentioned in my prepared remarks to actually identify what those opportunities are and how we can execute them without affecting customer availability as we move forward.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Lorraine, this is Marvin. Just one additional point regarding strategic inventory investments. Men's apparel was the only positive-comping apparel division for us in Q1 in spite of some of the weather challenges we faced. But two reasons why they were able to accomplish that were investments we've made in the big and tall category and in workwear.

Those two categories were more weather-resistant than typical spring attire, and it enabled that division to deliver a positive comp. So to Jeff's point, we want to be prudent because our overage versus last year in comp stores were driven in large part by 100 stores, where we set appliance displays, where we expanded mattress aggressively, and those were some of our best-performing top-line areas of the quarter. And so we want to balance being very, very smart and prudent on managing our working capital while continuing to drive sales.

Lorraine Hutchinson -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Thank you. And then could you quantify the gross margin headwind you faced last year as you were closing out the stores at the end of the quarter?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Well, from a quantification, it's difficult to do it in a very succinct fashion because it was an ongoing process. As Jeff mentioned in his prepared comments, the majority of the stores actually closed toward the end of the second quarter, so it was an iterative process that occurred in the first two quarters of the year. So it will be very difficult to kind of pinpoint on the calendar and impact. But it's obviously something that we're aware of, and something that we're managing and something that we're going to continue to understand what our compares are versus last year.

Lorraine Hutchinson -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Thank you.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Mark Altschwager with Baird.

Mark Altschwager -- Robert W. Baird & Company -- Analyst

Great. Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Just first on the gross margin.

You identified, I guess, three specific issues in the quarter. Any chance you could quantify the relative pressure from each of those?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Well, what I said in my prepared comments, Mark, is that the issues in dot.com were the most significant from a year-over-year impact. Because of some of the supply chain and process challenges that we faced, we made decisions on some holiday goods to gestate pricing in liquidation action. We did not want to carry the inventory into the upcoming quarter. We felt like, as I've mentioned, that it's important for us to run the business based on the full year, based on the long term and not make decisions that artificially make the quarter look better than the business dynamics present.

But the dot.com piece was a large one. The good news is, those issues were identified, process improvements are under way. And you can easily describe it as a one-time event that we don't see facing the same pressure going into the balance of the year. In addition to that, because we had, in our minds, that we can quickly and easily quantify with our internal data, weather impacts to the business from an apparel perspective, we took action to rid some of that inventory so we could have the proper space presentation for new goods coming in.

And again, that's another example of not running the business for the quarter but thinking about the whole year. And so those were kind of the two big things that impacted gross margin. And the good news is, is that we don't see those things repeating themselves in Q2. I mentioned that our May month-to-date sales performance is strong.

We note that because I think it's important for us to demonstrate that April trend was not predicated on any macro dynamics. It was predicated on the weather because the moment weather normalized in the last two weeks of April, we did deliver significantly strong performance. And that strong performance was carried into the month of May.

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

The only other point I would add to that is that with the first quarter, the mix of apparel was actually down on our overall composition of our sales. As a result of that, the margin associated with apparel is a higher margin and therefore, also impacted us from an overall basis.

Mark Altschwager -- Robert W. Baird & Company -- Analyst

Got it. Thank you. And then Jeff, just to follow up. At the start of the year, you provided some guideposts on gross margin, SG&A, credit income, just other items that built into the EPS outlook.

I know there's a lot of moving pieces now with the accounting changes. But maybe just specifically, can gross margin still be up slightly for the year? And any change to your expectations on credit for the full year based on your experience in Q1?

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

So as it relates to our margin, we are expecting our margins to improve over the course of the year. What we've seen this first quarter, the decline is going to have an impact for our overall for the year. But our expectation, as we get through Q2 as well as the balance of the back half, is that our margins will continue to improve based upon the actions that we are taking. As it relates to credit income, our outlook for credit income has not changed.

The improvement that we actually saw in the first quarter was as a result of some marketing funds that we had received. But at the outlook, with respect to the performance of the overall portfolio and the risk actions that we believe that we'll have to take with our partner, it will remain as we had given in our earlier guidance.

Mark Altschwager -- Robert W. Baird & Company -- Analyst

Appreciate the color. Best of luck.

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Matthew Boss with J.P.Morgan.

Matthew Boss -- J.P.Morgan -- Analyst

Thanks. Can you help quantify the impact of the calendar shift on the -- on your 1Q comp? I guess, any sense on magnitude of the improvement that you've seen in May? And then with the second quarter guided up 1%, just any way to rank the initiative that you see in place to drive back-half improvement and maybe including any update on the progressive partnership?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Matt, on the calendar shift, it's marginal. I mean, we can spend the rest of the call talking about shifted, non-shifted. But I think relative to our business, it's not material enough to get into the nuances of it. Relative to the growth areas for the balance of the year, we have quite a few to add that we still have a significant amount of confidence in.

Beauty is a significant part for us because it is weather-resistant. And also it provides a level of differentiation and brings an increased level of relevance to our stores. So we have 27 Sephora openings, 100 InStyle salons being renovated and we just have a very strong and vibrant jewelry business that's going to continue. We mentioned active where we're opening 700 Fanatics shops this summer.

We are very excited about that because we are arguably behind in the activewear trend, and we think this gives us the ability to catch up with a really unique and differentiated brand partnership with Fanatics. We have great expectations for our Home refresh business. We have 100 noncomp appliance showrooms, we have 300 non-comp mattress showrooms, and we have a new brand that we won't comp against in Frigidaire until the back half of the year. We continue to see improvements in our toy business, specifically with the competitive dynamics in the marketplace.

And we're not trying to be No.1 in market share in toys, but it's a great addition to the basket, and we're seeing great attachment data when the customer buys toys, how she goes to other parts of the store and buys other categories. Dot.com continues to grow for us, and we're excited about the operational changes we've made, the structural changes we've made, and we think that business is going to only continue to be a strong and incredibly important part of our portfolio. And last but really most important is apparel. I mean, we spent an enormous amount of time over the past 18 months, I mean, fixing our apparel assortment and making the necessary changes.

That is really reflective in how well men's apparel performed in spite of some weather challenges we saw in the Midwest and the Northeastern parts of our geographic areas. And when we look at women's apparel, we can see specific indications that that business is very healthy when we have seasonal weather trends, the same with kid's. And so apparel is the most significant initiative for us to grow positive comps. And again, without some of the challenges we faced in the first quarter, we think it would've happened.

So all of these things give us a significant amount of confidence that we'll continue to meet or exceed our sales guidance for the balance of the year. And we're going to continue just executing along those lines.

Matthew Boss -- J.P.Morgan -- Analyst

Great. And then just a follow-up. On the expense front, what's your estimate for underlying asset sales gain this year? And I guess, as we think about core SG&A, how much low-hanging fruit do you believe remains with your controllable cost? And as you think about the marketing side, do you think you're leaving any sales on the table as you continue to reduce marketing spend?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

So I'll talk about the marketing side. I'll let Jeff talk about asset assumptions. For marketing, we talked about marketing efficiencies. Our impressions were actually up 13% for the quarter.

So we don't see what we're doing in marketing as a detriment to share of voice and a detriment to driving traffic. If you combine our online and store traffic, I mean, we had positive traffic because as an omnichannel retail, you just can't look at traffic the traditional way. So we believe that the changes we're making in marketing, shifting more one-to-one, backing away from preprint, investing those dollars into digital, social and radio gives us the ability to be a lot more nimble. And so we feel confident that our marketing strategy is not only efficient but is driving increased impressions and share of voice.

And then we're going to continue to modify and continue to tweak it. But we don't have any concerns about that. I'll let Jeff take the rest of your questions.

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Sure. As it relates to asset sales and gains associated with that, at the beginning of the fiscal year, we had given guidance of $50 million to $60 million of gains that we would expect over the course of the year. In my prepared remarks, I had outlined what we had actually achieved in the first quarter associated with the sale of the Milwaukee facility. As it relates to SG&A, we believe that we continue to have opportunities in SG&A, specifically as we take a look at our overhead cost.

But also this year so far, at the beginning of the quarter, we had already taken some actions as related to our operations above store level as well as a few areas here at home office. We continue to want to find ways to be very disciplined, continue to find ways to, quite honestly, reshape our expense curve as we take a look at our national footprint. And we still believe that we have some opportunities across the business in order to achieve that.

Matthew Boss -- J.P.Morgan -- Analyst

Great. Thanks a lot.

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Paul Lejuez with Citi.

Paul Lejuez -- Citi -- Analyst

Hey, thanks, guys. You talked about a strong March. But just curious -- I think March should have been helped by Easter. So I'm curious if you can maybe talk about March ex the Easter shift, maybe March, April, together around that Easter period.

And then as -- I know you said that sales were decent in February and March. I'm curious if you had already picked up the pace of markdowns at that point? Or if you look at the sales gross margin equation during the February-March period as being a strong one? And then I guess related to that, if the margin pressure was just in April, what were the specific actions that were taken from a markdown perspective? And over what period to cause such a big impact to the quarter? Thanks, guys.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Well, specific to the months, when we look at February-March, shifted, unshifted, that the business was very strong. When we look at April, to provide some color, the first two weeks of April were negative 12 and a negative 24 comp, and that's when the weather was really difficult for us up north. The last two weeks were a plus 9.5 and a plus 10. So that gives you some perspective on the dynamics of the month of April.

And so we have good analytics where we can look at trends of businesses based on weather, based on sell-through, based on geographic locations. And we feel pretty confident in our analysis on how weather impacted our specific company and also how it impacted apparel specifically. And as we look at the month of May, when you look at shifted and unshifted, we're above our forecast, and apparel is performing significantly strong, specifically in women's apparel. And so it gives us confidence that we made the right strategic decisions.

Relative to the markdowns and relative to gross margin, we took actions throughout the quarter. There was no designated period where we did more or less. April really hurt us from a sales perspective. But when we were looking at the decision we had to make specific to some of the goods that were challenged in the online area due to process and some supply chain issues, I mean, we took those actions obviously in the earlier part of the quarter to liquidate them out and to just take aggressive pricing action.

That was the most significant impact to our gross margin reduction versus last year. Because we had to take aggressive steps to exit out product that was not very desirable based on the time frame of the year. And we did not want to carry it into the balance of the quarter or carry it into the balance of Q2. And so those were the most aggressive steps that we took to address those issues, and they had a dramatic impact on gross margin.

Paul Lejuez -- Citi -- Analyst

Gotcha. And then just one follow-up. Can you talk about your plans in the lease-to-own business, timing of that? And what's built-in to your guidance for that business this year?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

There's really nothing in the guidance. We're testing it. The thing that we want to make sure that we understand is are we providing a service to the customer. At the end of the day, we want to make sure that we give a customer, that may not have the financial wherewithal to purchase something like an appliance but they need it, the ability to do it that can fall within their financial means.

And so that, we're testing in a couple of different markets, a couple of different iterations. It's still early, but we hope to have some clarity on kind of what we can and cannot do as we get into the second half of the year.

Paul Lejuez -- Citi -- Analyst

Gotcha. Thanks, guys. Good luck.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Jeff Van Sinderen with B. Riley & FBR.

Richard Magnusen -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

Hello. This is Richard Magnusen in for Jeff Van Sinderen. We know that you've been increasing penetration in some of the athletic and athleisure brands, but can you provide more detail on�how you are evolving the women's assortment? And any changes we can expect for the back-to-school season in the fall time frame this year? And also with omnichannel infrastructures so could you give us an idea of what we can kind of change expect to see for the omnichannel for back-to-school then holiday this year? And then lastly, are you seeing any impact from the Bon-Ton liquidation?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

OK. Well, look, I will -- I'll take the Bon-Ton piece. I have our chief customer officer, Joe McFarland here, and I'll let Joe talk a little bit about women's apparel going into back-to-school. Then we have Therace Risch here, our head of IT and digital, and I'll let Therace just talk a little bit about some of the structural organization of changes and some of the things we're doing to drive really the key part of our omni business, which is mobile.

As it relates to Bon-Ton, we have not seen any material impact to our business with the Bon-Ton closings. Just to give you some context. We have 97 malls that we share with Bon-Ton. That number was 107, but over the course of the last couple of years, they closed stores.

As they liquidate, we've seen really no material impact to the business. We believe that's, in part, because those stores were -- had very low inventory levels before the liquidation started. So there's not a lot of product to speak of that's driving traffic and that we think will cannibalize our businesses. Obviously, we're keeping a very close eye on that.

And we're going to follow it in -- with intent detail. But as we look at our other competitor, Sears, conversely, we share over 350 malls with Sears. And we've had 100 Sears stores closed in malls we've shared over the course of the last, call it, three years. So we have a really good understanding of the impact to our business when a Sears closes, and the net effect is positive.

And it was positive even before we were strategically introducing categories like appliances and categories like mattress and categories like workwear. So as we've introduced those specific categories, when we see a Sears close, it's a greater significant benefit to our business in the whole end-to-end process. So it's a dynamic marketplace. We are paying very close attention to it, and we're prepared to make sure that we can gain market share where it makes sense.

So I'll let Joe talk a little bit about women's apparel for back-to-school and what's coming. I'll let Therace talk a little bit about mobile and some of the other steps we're taking to continue to drive digital. So I'll let Joe take it first.

Joseph McFarland -- Chief Customer Officer

All right. Thanks, Marvin. From a women's-apparel standpoint, we continue to be very pleased with the work that Jodie and her team are doing in women's apparel. So specific categories, beginning with active, we continue to see great growth in our active brands.

We will be leaning more heavily into Nike as we move forward, the expansion of Adidas and the other active brands and also our own private label Xersion brand. So we continue to see great progress for the quarter. Our women's active business grew double digits. Breaking it down into the more traditional customer, we're very pleased with the sequential improvements we see in our modern wear, things like Worthington, things like a.n.a.

And so we'll continue our refined approach to the mix, to what the customer is responding to. In addition, our Liz Claiborne brand, we saw great success in Q1. We have continued plans to continue to lean into the Liz Claiborne brand and improve -- and continue to improve the overall women's. And then finally, from women's plus, the work the team continues to execute in the all plus-size businesses across the entire store, we're pleased with what we're seeing there.

Therace Risch -- Chief Information Officer

We've made significant investments in our e-commerce technology platform over the last 18 months, including, as Marvin called out, our mobile platform. This has been very important to set the stage for what we're starting to work on now, which is creating a very much inspiring experience on the website. This is going to enable us to drive sales for apparel and fine jewelry, which will improve our overall e-commerce profitability. And we are also doing quite a bit of work to better connect the stores experience with the e-commerce experience so that we're more seamless for our customer.

So I'm excited that our technology platform is largely in place and that we can shift to a better customer experience going forward.

Richard Magnusen -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

OK. And I have one last question. Can you give any more details in the new facility in Hesperia that you announced a couple of days ago? And maybe exact size and region it will service?

Trent Kruse -- Investor Relations

I'll take that one. This is Trent. No details. I mean, that's a replacement of our existing facility in Buena Park.

It will do -- it will service what that facility was servicing, frankly. So no meaningful updates. We're excited obviously to have a brand new facility, lots of great technology in place. It will certainly enhance our capabilities on the West Coast.

Richard Magnusen -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

Great. Well, thank you very much.

Trent Kruse -- Investor Relations

Sure.

Operator

Our next question comes from Kimberly Greenberger with Morgan Stanley.

Kimberly Greenberger -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Oh, thank you. Good morning. Marvin, I wasn't really sure I understood what happened with the e-commerce business. I think you talked about some issues during the first quarter.

Would you mind just elaborating on that and then talk about the fix that you've got in place now? And then in the call-outs for the strongest categories here in Q1, you didn't mention appliances. Can you just talk about the appliance performance in the quarter? And any additional rollouts of appliance sort of shop in shops as we get throughout the year?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

OK, Kimberly. For appliances first, we delivered a 15% comp in appliances for the quarter. It exceeded our internal forecast, and we are very pleased with that business. We're in the process of evaluating how we can make that business work with a smaller footprint because we have stores that are just square footage-constrained.

And so as we can figure out through test and pilots how to create a smaller footprint that we can possibly put in the smaller square footage stores, we'll see the possibility of improving or expanding the number of locations that we have. We're pleased with our performance thus far, and our best performing stores tend to be stores that share a mall with Sears, which gives us confidence that we can compete head-to-head very well. Relative to gross margin and e-commerce, we have to take pricing actions and clearance actions to liquidate dot.com holiday inventory. This was due to some supply chain process issues that prevented holiday product from properly flowing through the dot.com distribution centers in a timely way so that we can get it shipped to consumers.

The good news is, is we have store-fulfillment capabilities. So we didn't lose sales because the moment that order was made and identified, the system ordered it and picked and ported from a store location closest to the customer's ZIP Code, which was great for sales but it masked the issue that we were not effectively leveraging the supply chain capabilities to get the product in the band, meaning in the DC, to be picked and pulled. So if something has been identified, we put structure process and teams in place, and this will not occur again. But it impacted the business.

And when we came to the realization that we had inventory that was not properly executed in the supply chain, we took action on it because as I mentioned, I think Jeff noted as well, we wanted to make sure that we made the prudent decision for the business for the long term and not carry that inventory into the next quarter. So we took really aggressive steps to exit it, and those steps were the most significant impact to our gross margin.

Kimberly Greenberger -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

That's very helpful. Thank you so much. And then Jeff, I just had a follow-up on SG&A. Could you just describe the reduction in leasing expenses associated with remaining amortization of a gain on sale of a leasehold interest last year? Is that finished? What is that item exactly? And is this the only quarter when you should see an -- when we should see an impact from that?

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. So you may recall that last year, we had sold the Paramus, New Jersey, facility, which we are actually closing this fiscal year. And in that transaction, we realized a $50 million gain; $20 million of the $50 million was recognized last year, and $30 million of it was recognized this year. Given the fact that we were actually leasing back that property from the landlord for a certain period of time, we had to offset the gain against the lease expense and SG&A.

And it's just an accounting sort of standard that we had to comply with. It is now complete. We would not have any more amortization associated with that transaction.

Kimberly Greenberger -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Great. Thank you so much.

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Paul Trussell with Deutsche Bank.

Paul Trussell -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Good morning. Last year in the second quarter, I think it's fair to say that was a dynamic time for the company. You had a number of store closings and liquidation sales ongoing. So just asking for maybe a little bit more handholding on how we should think about the amount of recovery possible or expected in the merchandise margins for 2Q.

And also, you outlined already, I believe, expectation for SG&A dollars to be down in 2Q. Can you talk about any potential magnitude and what the drivers of that cost reduction are? Thank you.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Paul, this is Marvin. I'll take it first. So Jeff mentioned that we expect gross margin to improve year over year in Q2, and we expect SG&A to be down. SG&A decline is driven in large part just by continued efficiencies in the business.

I mean, we're really pleased with our performance in SG&A over the last couple of years. When we started on this path, we were significantly higher than what I believe we should be, and we've gotten the number down to a more respectable range. But we're going to continue to work on it. We think we still have structural opportunities with organizational layers that we need to address.

We have opportunities to continue to invest in technology that will minimize the amount of ineffective tasks that we're taking on. In the store, Joe McFarland's team is working really hard to find ways to invest technology, reduce task and improve service. And we've seen that occur over the last 12 months, and we think there is still room for improvement. But there is no one silver bullet.

It's a combination of a lot of things very similar to what we were able to deliver in Q1. Relative to gross margin, Jeff outlined some of the key things that we're working on and will continue to work on. Things like continuing to have more dynamic pricing and leveraging data from a pricing standpoint, continuing to understand which promotions are accretive from a customer response as well as top and bottom line, ensuring that we look at -- continue to lean into our markdown optimization, which we're having some really nice success on. A lot of work in the supply chain, as I mentioned, Therace and her team have made tremendous strides to remove some of the impediments that were really negatively impacting the company on a profit perspective.

And in the explanation I just provided to Kimberly regarding the issue within the holiday supply chain and process-related issues with dot.com. That's not going to repeat itself. I'm glad we identified it, and now we understand how we cannot allow it to occur again. So it's going to be improved, and we see improvement in gross margin for the balance of the year.

And so we're going to leave it at that. We're not getting into a ton of specifics because we want to make sure that we are going to be committed to just executing the plans that Jeff laid out, and there are other things we'll continue to work on to hopefully, get some upside to sales and to profit.

Paul Trussell -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Thank you. And maybe bigger-picture, one of the pillars of your strategic framework is increasing revenue per customer. Can you just give us an update on how you're tracking on that front? And what are some of the more specific initiatives in order to drive that initiative?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Well, Paul, what I'll tell you is that we've been very pleased with all of our strategic initiatives. Revenue per customer is defined as, you are a core JCPenney customer and you shop us but you don't shop us across the entire store. And so as we think about revenue per customer, it's about introducing things to our existing customers that they are unaware that are available at JCPenney. I mean, you'd be surprised a number of customers that still don't know that we have Sephora shops in 75% of our stores.

And so you've noticed more marketing along those lines and the specific line of marketing within the social media channels. We launched appliances and mattress and furniture simply because the data informed us that 70% of our customers were homeowners. Yet they were buying their furniture, mattresses and appliances in other locations. So that's an indication.

When we did our fail search analysis going online to determine what customers were searching for on jcpenney.com that we didn't sell, the No.1 category was toys. And so getting into that business, it's not again to be a market share leader. But to have another category that increases revenue and increases basket size when a customer is shopping. And we've -- we're behind as it relates to activewear.

And so Joe laid out some of the things that we're doing in women's. But across the store, in those 700 Fanatics shops are going to help us to take those customers that really want to have a broad assortment of activewear and give it to them. That's something that we haven't done in the past. And the last component of revenue per customer is our special size business.

We've done a lot of analysis on our customers, our customer demographic, and we understand that special sizes is something that they desire. And so our partnership with Shaquille O'Neal is to take our market share lead in men's big and tall and lean into it even more. We talked about the performance of our Liz Claiborne plus-size women's businesses. That business is a non-comp business for the first half of the year, and we're seeing terrific results.

Not to mention, our Kid's plus business, Boys Husky and Girls Plus. So all of those businesses fall under the umbrella of revenue per customer because we had customer shopping JCPenney. They wanted those categories, and we didn't sell them. And so that initiative is working well for us, and we're going to continue to execute better and continue to research our customers to find out what else they are looking for that we can possibly add to our assortment.

Paul Trussell -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Thank you for the color. Best of luck.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Oliver Chen with Cowen.

Oliver Chen -- Cowen & Company -- Analyst

Hi. Thank you very much. We had a question about women's apparel and curation and navigation in-store, just regarding the inventory levels and what you're thinking about speed and stability that test read and react as well as making sure your customer can navigate well. Thank you.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Oliver, we've implemented a speed calendar, and this impacts women's apparel more so than any other merchandising category. We have reduced the time from develop, design, to sales for -- by 40%. We have certain categories in women's apparel that we are updating on a monthly basis. And that's something that we've never done before.

So we literally have a fast lane in the supply chain for women's apparel. And this is primarily focused on tops because we know that the ratio of tops to bottoms is something that we want to continue to get better at. And so when we think about that, and we think about our brands and our customer demographic, that is one area that we have a high degree of optimism that's going to allow us to get this business to a positive comp. And although we know we are impacted by weather in the first quarter in women's apparel, the business still performed better than it did in Q4.

And we are just going to continue to see this business getting better and better. And part of it is newness, freshness and the ability to create excitement on the floor with just more relevant and more recent updates to the business. And I'll let Joe just add a couple more comments on that.

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Oliver, from a read-and-react standpoint, we spent a lot of time with the teams. And if you think about the new fashion sets that we've landed, both in the month of March, the month of April and then for this month in May. For the March set, we were very pleased with the increased sell-through compared to last year. The increase in the sell-through, same thing with the set -- new set of fashion that landed on our floor for our April set as well as our May set.

We're very, very pleased with the improvements that we're making. The curation of the design team, the merchandising team, our private brands team and really have this pulling together and coming to life on the floor. And coupled with our new advertising campaign, we really like the early results that we're seeing.

Oliver Chen -- Cowen & Company -- Analyst

And just a few quick ones. Regarding pricing, are you feeling good about the consumer reception of pricing and simplification in terms of being competitive on the right key items and balancing how you communicate that message? And the last thing was about store base. I would just love your thoughts as you continue to innovate across omnichannel and think about format and service levels and the right levels of capex and balancing lower productivity versus higher productivity stores. What is your latest framework in thinking about the physical plus the digital?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

So I'll take those two. On pricing, we continue to focus on simplification. We think that in a high/low environment, we've come to the conclusion that our customers prefer personals. It helps them to understand the value proposition.

But there's work that we can do in that we're testing and making that a more simplistic math equation for customers. But we also had found some benefit in being everyday price, and it works by category. Certain price points work really well when there is just a standard price and others work better when there's personal. But that is something that Therace and her team are really working with the stores on to make sure that we have more continuity between online and in-store.

But we're making great progress. We've come a significant way from when we started this over a year and a half ago. Relative to the store base, I mean, we talked a lot about omnichannel, and I think the number is somewhere around 80% of all of our e-commerce purchases touch a physical store. So stores are important, and stores will help us to reduce the delivery and fulfillment costs over time.

Having said that, we know that we have to continue to invest the right level of capex. That's one of the reasons why we're still investing in Sephora, Fanatic shops, appliance showrooms, men's big and tall, women's plus. All of these require us to elevate the store presentation, and that's what we're doing. And we're evaluating our fleet, making sure that we're not going to run stores that are not productive and not adding value to the enterprise.

And that's an ongoing process.

Oliver Chen -- Cowen & Company -- Analyst

Thank you. Best regards.

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

OK. Thank you.

Operator

Our last question comes from Chuck Grom from Gordon Haskett.

Chuck Grom -- Gordon Haskett -- Analyst

Hey, guys. Just a couple of housekeeping things here at the end. First on the $30 million gain, Jeff, is- the assumption that the 50 to 60 of asset real estate deals, is it separate from that? Or is that combined?

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

It is separate.

Chuck Grom -- Gordon Haskett -- Analyst

It is separate. OK. And then on the service cost. Geographically, on your P&L, is that going to flow through as a contra pension income? Or is it going to come through on the SG&A line?

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. The service cost components flows through the SG&A.

Chuck Grom -- Gordon Haskett -- Analyst

OK. And then just here in 2Q, it definitely seems like April got significantly better. And if I recall back on 2Q of last year, May was your toughest compare of the year. So I guess, Marvin, do you kind of look at the 1% guide as being conservative or realistic? And how should we frame out the progression of apparel in the second quarter?

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Chuck, what we're trying to do is we're trying to underpromise and overdeliver, specifically on the revenue side. The key to our second quarter and the balance of our year is apparel. And what I can say is we are very pleased with our apparel performance in the last two weeks of April and the month of May. And that is going to be the linchpin for our business, and there has been an enormous amount of work.

So the short answer is, we look at it as an underpromise, hoping to over-deliver. And we think we're going to be driven by improved apparel performance. And we're seeing that, and that gives us confidence and gives us encouragement that we're headed in the right direction.

Chuck Grom -- Gordon Haskett -- Analyst

OK. Best of luck. Thanks.

Operator

[Operator signoff]

Duration: 65 minutes

Call Participants:

Trent Kruse -- Investor Relations

Marvin Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Jeff Davis -- Chief Financial Officer

Lorraine Hutchinson -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Mark Altschwager -- Robert W. Baird & Company -- Analyst

Matthew Boss -- J.P.Morgan -- Analyst

Paul Lejuez -- Citi -- Analyst

Richard Magnusen -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

Joseph McFarland -- Chief Customer Officer

Therace Risch -- Chief Information Officer

Kimberly Greenberger -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Paul Trussell -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Oliver Chen -- Cowen & Company -- Analyst

Chuck Grom -- Gordon Haskett -- Analyst

More JCP analysis

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

10 stocks we like better than J.C. PenneyWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and J.C. Penney wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

Click here to learn about these picks!

*Stock Advisor returns as of May 8, 2018